Attachment 125221 Details for Bug 168811 – file.diff

[patch] file.diff

file.diff (text/plain), 4.38 KB, created by Diane Bruce on 2012-06-07 16:40:15 UTC

(hide)

Description:

Filename:

MIME Type:

Creator: Diane Bruce

Created: 2012-06-07 16:40:15 UTC

Size: 4.38 KB

patch

obsolete

>Index: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/multimedia/multimedia-input.xml
>===================================================================
>--- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/multimedia/multimedia-input.xml	(revision 39006)
>+++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs/multimedia/multimedia-input.xml	(working copy)
>@@ -41,6 +41,67 @@
> 	    <tags>2012,bsdcan,bsdcan2012,photos,benedict reuschling</tags>
> 	</item>
> 
>+	<item source="bsdcan" added="20120530">
>+	    <title>BSDCan-2012 - Michael Dexter - An applied survey of BSD multiplicity and virtualization strategies from chroot to BHyVe</title>
>+		<desc>
>+		Ever since the University of California, Berkeley CSRG
>+		implemented the chroot(8) command and system call in its
>+		BSD operating system in 1982, the community-developed 
>+		BSD Unix derivatives have set the standard for
>+		the introduction of plurality to the conventionally-singular
>+		Unix computing model. Today's system operators and developers
>+		have an array of BSD-licensed multiplicity strategies at their
>+		disposal that offer various degrees of both isolation and 
>+		virtualization when introducing plurality. This paper will
>+		survey current and experimental BSD multiplicity strategies
>+		including chroot, FreeBSD jail, NetBSD/Xen, Amazon EC2,
>+		compatlinux, GXemul and SIMH, plus experimental strategies
>+		such as FreeBSD BHyVe, compatmach, Usermode NetBSD,
>+		Dragonfly BSD vkernel, OpenBSD sysjail and NetBSD mult.
>+		As an applied survey, this paper will both categorize each
>+		multiplicity strategy by the Unix environment to which
>+		it introduces plurality and demonstrate the usage
>+		of the utilities relating to each solution.
>+		</desc>
>+	    <overview>http://www.bsdcan.org/2012/schedule/events/291en.html</overview>
>+	    <tags>2012,bsdcan,bsdcan2012,papers,michael dexter</tags>
>+	    <files>
>+		<file>
>+		    <url>http://www.bsdcan.org/2011/schedule/events/291en.html</url>
>+		    <desc>html</desc>
>+		    <tags>html</tags>
>+		</file>
>+	    </files>
>+	</item>
>+
>+	<item source="bsdcan" added="20120530">
>+	    <title>BSDCan-2012 - Kirk McKusick - An Overview of Locking in the FreeBSD Kernel</title>
>+		<desc>
>+		The FreeBSD kernel uses seven different types of locks
>+		to ensure proper access to the resources that it manages.
>+		This talk describes the hierarchy of these locks from
>+		the low-level and simple to the high-level and full-featured.
>+
>+		The functionality of each type of lock is described along
>+		with the problem domain for which it is intended. 
>+		The talk concludes by describing the witness system
>+		within the FreeBSD kernel that tracks the usage of all
>+		the locks in the system and reports any possible deadlocks
>+		that might occur because of improper acquisition ordering
>+		of locks.
>+		</desc>
>+	    <overview>http://www.bsdcan.org/2012/schedule/events/306en.html</overview>
>+	    <tags>2012,bsdcan,bsdcan2012,papers,kirk mckusick</tags>
>+	    <files>
>+		<file>
>+		    <url>http://www.bsdcan.org/2012/schedule/attachments/195_locking.pdf</url>
>+		    <size>27 Kb</size>
>+		    <desc>Slides</desc>
>+		    <tags>pdf</tags>
>+		</file>
>+	    </files>
>+	</item>
>+
> 	<item source="bsdcan" added="20120528">
> 	    <title>BSDCan-2012 Photos - Developers summit and conference</title>
> 	    <overview>http://gallery.keltia.net/v/voyages/conferences/bsdcan-2012/devsummit/</overview>
>@@ -92,6 +153,30 @@
> 	    <tags>2010,bsdcan,bsdcan2010,photos,diane bruce</tags>
> 	</item>
> 
>+	<item source="bsdcan" added="20100520">
>+	    <title>BSDCan-2010 - Kris Moore - The PBI format re-implemented for FreeBSD and PC-BSD</title>
>+		<desc>
>+		The PBI format (Push Button Installer) has been the default
>+		package management system for PC-BSD going on 5+ years now.
>+		However as we looked to the future it became apparent that it
>+		was greatly needing an overhaul to both improve its
>+		functionality, and expand its usage outside the scope of
>+		just PC-BSD. Among the areas needing improvement were how
>+		it dealt with identical libraries between applications,
>+		the heavy requirements from being implemented in QT/KDE,
>+		and lack of a digital verification mechanism.
>+		</desc>
>+	    <overview>http://www.bsdcan.org/2011/schedule/events/215en.html</overview>
>+	    <tags>2010,bsdcan,bsdcan2010,papers,kris moore</tags>
>+	    <files>
>+		<file>
>+		    <url>http://www.bsdcan.org/2011/schedule/events/215en.html</url>
>+		    <desc>html</desc>
>+		    <tags>html</tags>
>+		</file>
>+	    </files>
>+	</item>
>+
>

Actions: View | Diff

Attachments on bug 168811: 125221