View | Details | Raw Unified | Return to bug 217294 | Differences between
and this patch

Collapse All | Expand All

(-)vuln.xml (+37 lines)
Lines 58-63 Link Here
58
  * Do not forget port variants (linux-f10-libxml2, libxml2, etc.)
58
  * Do not forget port variants (linux-f10-libxml2, libxml2, etc.)
59
-->
59
-->
60
<vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1">
60
<vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1">
61
  <vuln vid="e53cb1e7-f891-11e6-b2c3-589cfc0654e1">
62
    <topic>openssl -- multiple DoS vulnerabilities</topic>
63
    <affects>
64
      <package>
65
	<name>linux-c6-openssl</name>
66
	<range><lt>1.0.1e_13</lt></range>
67
      </package>
68
      <package>
69
	<name>linux-c7-openssl</name>
70
	<range><lt>1.0.1e_3</lt></range>
71
      </package>
72
    </affects>
73
    <description>
74
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
75
	<p>Red Hat reports:</p>
76
	<blockquote cite="https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html">
77
	<p>An integer underflow leading to an out of bounds read flaw was found in
78
	OpenSSL. A remote attacker could possibly use this flaw to crash a 32-bit
79
	TLS/SSL server or client using OpenSSL if it used the RC4-MD5 cipher suite.</p>
80
	<p>A denial of service flaw was found in the way the TLS/SSL protocol defined
81
	processing of ALERT packets during a connection handshake. A remote attacker
82
	could use this flaw to make a TLS/SSL server consume an excessive amount of CPU
83
	and fail to accept connections form other clients.</p>
84
	</blockquote>
85
      </body>
86
    </description>
87
    <references>
88
      <url>https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0286.html</url>
89
      <cvename>2017-3731</cvename>
90
      <cvename>2016-8610</cvename>
91
    </references>
92
    <dates>
93
      <discovery>2017-02-20</discovery>
94
      <entry>2017-02-22</entry>
95
    </dates>
96
  </vuln>
97
61
  <vuln vid="786a7d87-f826-11e6-9436-14dae9d5a9d2">
98
  <vuln vid="786a7d87-f826-11e6-9436-14dae9d5a9d2">
62
    <topic>fbsdmon -- information disclosure vulnerability</topic>
99
    <topic>fbsdmon -- information disclosure vulnerability</topic>
63
    <affects>
100
    <affects>

Return to bug 217294