|
Lines 76-81
Notes:
Link Here
|
| 76 |
* Do not forget port variants (linux-f10-libxml2, libxml2, etc.) |
76 |
* Do not forget port variants (linux-f10-libxml2, libxml2, etc.) |
| 77 |
--> |
77 |
--> |
| 78 |
<vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1"> |
78 |
<vuxml xmlns="http://www.vuxml.org/apps/vuxml-1"> |
|
|
79 |
<vuln vid="99093a04-317c-11ec-9749-00224d821998"> |
| 80 |
<topic>strongswan - denial-of-service vulnerability in the gmp plugin/denial-of-service vulnerability in the in-memory certificate cache</topic> |
| 81 |
<affects> |
| 82 |
<package> |
| 83 |
<name>strongswan</name> |
| 84 |
<range><lt>5.9.4</lt></range> |
| 85 |
</package> |
| 86 |
</affects> |
| 87 |
<description> |
| 88 |
<body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> |
| 89 |
<p>Strongswan Release Notes reports:</p> |
| 90 |
<blockquote cite="https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan/releases/tag/5.9.4"> |
| 91 |
<p>Fixed a denial-of-service vulnerability in the gmp plugin that was caused by an integer overflow when processing RSASSA-PSS signatures with very large salt lengths. This vulnerability has been registered as CVE-2021-41990.</p> |
| 92 |
<p>Fixed a denial-of-service vulnerability in the in-memory certificate cache if certificates are replaced and a very large random value caused an integer overflow. This vulnerability has been registered as CVE-2021-41991.</p> |
| 93 |
</blockquote> |
| 94 |
</body> |
| 95 |
</description> |
| 96 |
<references> |
| 97 |
<url>https://www.strongswan.org/blog/2021/10/18/strongswan-vulnerability-(cve-2021-41990).html</url> |
| 98 |
<url>https://www.strongswan.org/blog/2021/10/18/strongswan-vulnerability-(cve-2021-41991).html</url> |
| 99 |
</references> |
| 100 |
<dates> |
| 101 |
<discovery>2021-10-04</discovery> |
| 102 |
<entry>2021-10-19</entry> |
| 103 |
</dates> |
| 104 |
</vuln> |
| 105 |
|
| 79 |
<vuln vid="62da9702-b4cc-11eb-b9c9-6cc21735f730"> |
106 |
<vuln vid="62da9702-b4cc-11eb-b9c9-6cc21735f730"> |
| 80 |
<topic>PostgreSQL server -- two security issues</topic> |
107 |
<topic>PostgreSQL server -- two security issues</topic> |
| 81 |
<affects> |
108 |
<affects> |