Attachment 25051 Details for Bug 42715 – file.diff

[patch] file.diff

file.diff (text/plain), 3.95 KB, created by dominic_marks on 2002-09-12 22:10:00 UTC

(hide)

Description:

Filename:

MIME Type:

Creator: dominic_marks

Created: 2002-09-12 22:10:00 UTC

Size: 3.95 KB

patch

obsolete

>Index: usenix-devsummit.sgml
>===================================================================
>RCS file: /media/cvs/freebsd/www/en/events/2002/usenix-devsummit.sgml,v
>retrieving revision 1.6
>diff -u -3 -p -r1.6 usenix-devsummit.sgml
>--- usenix-devsummit.sgml	10 Sep 2002 22:42:21 -0000	1.6
>+++ usenix-devsummit.sgml	12 Sep 2002 21:02:13 -0000
>@@ -50,8 +50,8 @@ Stokely</a>.
> Committers in person:
> <ul>
> <li>Robert Watson (rwatson)</li>
>- <li>Julian Elischer(julian)</li>
>- <li>John Baldwin(jhb)</li>
>+ <li>Julian Elischer (julian)</li>
>+ <li>John Baldwin (jhb)</li>
> <li>Matt Dillon (dillon)</li>
> <li>David O'Brien (obrien)</li>
> <li>Jeffery Hsu (hsu)</li>
>@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ for 5.0.
> jhb : The big thing for 5.0 is to
> get the network stack out from under Giant.
> 
>-jhb : Jefferey Xu and Jennifer Ying
>+jhb : Jefferey Hsu and Jennifer Yang
> were here to talk about this. They have the PCBs checked in now.
> 
> jennifer : Interface Queues and SynCache
>@@ -304,7 +304,9 @@ there could be a flag to just say "don't
> would help with issues such as the socket code assuming memory is type
> stable.
> 
>-Over to alc on the VM system. Nothing to say.
>+Over to Alan Cox on the VM system.
>+
>+alc : Nothing to say.
> 
> bmilekic : As much as I might get hated
> for this. Will preemption stuff go in by 5.0?
>@@ -610,7 +612,7 @@ first.
> 
> </div>
> 
>-<h3>Adillon64</h3>
>+<h3>AMD64</h3>
> 
> <div class="discussion">
> 
>@@ -618,7 +620,7 @@ first.
> simulator problems.
> 
> obrien : The issues are about legal
>-and NDA. Adillon decided on <a href="http://www.freebsdmall.com">FreeBSD
>+and NDA. AMD decided on <a href="http://www.freebsdmall.com">FreeBSD
> Mall</a> as the NDA person. I have not had a working simulator since
> September.
> 
>@@ -635,7 +637,7 @@ Should we discuss that at another date?<
> 
> </div>
> 
>-<h3>MIps</h3>
>+<h3>MIPs</h3>
> 
> <div class="discussion">
> 
>@@ -717,7 +719,7 @@ out. Polished 4.2. We need to start ma
> November is still the date we're shooting for. We're going to do a
> 4.7 and a 4.8. DP3?
> 
>-***GET samIDE FROM MURRAY***
>+***GET SLIDE FROM MURRAY***
> 
> <div class="discussion">
> 
>@@ -867,15 +869,15 @@ is wrong but this is what I heard)?
> 5.0 thing.
> 
> warner : Problems with interrupt
>-routing in alcPCI?
>+routing in ACPI?
> 
>-takawata : Cannot handle PCI PCI
>-interrupt routing. Many 802.11x have this problem.
>+takawata : Cannot handle
>+PCI&lt;-&gt;PCI interrupt routing. Many 802.11x have this problem.
> 
> julian : Is it a problem from Intel?
> 
> takawata : This is not an Intel
>-problem but a problem on our side. PCI PCI routing code should be
>+problem but a problem on our side. PCI&lt;-&gt;PCI routing code should be
> added. New code is necessary.
> 
> <pre>
>@@ -888,7 +890,7 @@ GEOM		TrustedBSD Malc	BusDMA			Newbus SM
> C++		Cardbus		libwhisk/sysinstall	KOBJ? (no!)
> 				sparc64
> 
>-Perl Removal	alcPI		Alpha SMP Stability	Pkgs for
>+Perl Removal	ACPI		Alpha SMP Stability	Pkgs for
> 							sparc64, IA64
> 
> devd		PCI intr route	document hints		release docs
>@@ -1016,7 +1018,8 @@ Prefer the former.
> rwatson : Perhaps we need to create a
> FreeBSD 5 syscall vector. Could be a new ABI.
> 
>-julian : Aren't there enough other numbers?
>+julian : Aren't there enough other
>+numbers?
> 
> rwatson : That's one way to look at it
> and other platforms have done that? Is that too heavy weight?

Actions: View | Diff

Attachments on bug 42715: 25051