View | Details | Raw Unified | Return to bug 51658
Collapse All | Expand All

(-)chapter.new.sgml (-13 / +18 lines)
Lines 1061-1079 Link Here
1061
1061
1062
      <para>as well.</para>
1062
      <para>as well.</para>
1063
    </sect2>
1063
    </sect2>
1064
1064
    
1065
    <sect2>
1066
      <title>Performance</title>
1067
1068
      <para>My bridge/firewall is a Pentium 90 with one 3Com 3C900B
1069
	and one 3C905B.  The protected side of the network runs at
1070
	10&nbsp;mbps half duplex and the connection between the bridge
1071
	and my router (a Cisco 675) runs at 100&nbsp;mbps full duplex.
1072
	With no filtering enabled, I have found that the bridge adds
1073
	about 0.4&nbsp;milliseconds of latency to pings from the
1074
	protected 10&nbsp;mbps network to the Cisco 675.</para>
1075
    </sect2>
1076
1077
    <sect2>
1065
    <sect2>
1078
      <title>Other Information</title>
1066
      <title>Other Information</title>
1079
1067
Lines 1085-1090 Link Here
1085
      <para>If you have multiple bridges on your network, there cannot be more
1073
      <para>If you have multiple bridges on your network, there cannot be more
1086
	than one path between any two workstations.  Technically, this means
1074
	than one path between any two workstations.  Technically, this means
1087
	that there is no support for spanning tree link management.</para>
1075
	that there is no support for spanning tree link management.</para>
1076
1077
      <para>A bridge can increase the reaction times in your network by
1078
        adding a lateny to your ping times, especially for traffic from
1079
        one segment to another. 
1080
      
1081
        <example>
1082
          <title>Increased ping times caused by a bridge</title>
1083
        
1084
          <para>A bridge/firewall was tested on a Pentium 90 with one
1085
            3Com 3C900B and one 3C905B.  The protected side of the network
1086
            ran at 10&nbsp;mbps half duplex and the connection between the
1087
            bridge and the router (a Cisco 675) ran at 100&nbsp;mbps full
1088
            duplex.  With no filtering enabled, the bridge added about
1089
            0.4&nbsp;milliseconds of latency to pings from the protected
1090
            10&nbsp;mbps network to the Cisco 675 router.</para>
1091
        </example>
1092
      </para>
1088
    </sect2>
1093
    </sect2>
1089
  </sect1>
1094
  </sect1>

Return to bug 51658