FreeBSD Bugzilla – Attachment 41181 Details for
Bug 64534
misfitting in two parts of man 8 ipfw about quantity of ports that may be specified in a rule
Home
|
New
|
Browse
|
Search
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
Remember
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
ipfw.8-patch
ipfw.8-patch (text/plain), 815 bytes, created by
Marc Silver
on 2004-03-23 14:14:00 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
ipfw.8-patch
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Marc Silver
Created:
2004-03-23 14:14:00 UTC
Size:
815 bytes
patch
obsolete
>--- ipfw.8-orig Tue Mar 23 16:02:01 2004 >+++ ipfw.8 Tue Mar 23 16:07:46 2004 >@@ -831,8 +831,14 @@ > Service names (from > .Pa /etc/services ) > may be used instead of numeric port values. >-The length of the port list is limited to 30 ports or ranges, >-though one can specify larger ranges by using an >+The length of the port list is dependant on the version of >+.Nm >+being used; >+.Nm ipfw1 >+is limited to 10 ports or ranges, while >+.Nm ipfw2 >+increases this limit to 30. >+One can specify larger ranges by using an > .Em or-block > in the > .Cm options >@@ -1819,7 +1825,7 @@ > .It Port specifications > .Nm ipfw1 > only allows one port range when specifying TCP and UDP ports, and >-is limited to 10 entries instead of the 15 allowed by >+is limited to 10 entries instead of the 30 allowed by > .Nm ipfw2 . > Also, in > .Nm ipfw1
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
Attachments on
bug 64534
: 41181