FreeBSD Bugzilla – Attachment 46867 Details for
Bug 71862
[PATCH] FAQ update: Use entity &xorg; instead of X.org
Home
|
New
|
Browse
|
Search
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
Remember
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
[patch]
xorg.diff
xorg.diff (text/plain), 4.24 KB, created by
Joel Dahl
on 2004-09-18 12:30:14 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
xorg.diff
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Joel Dahl
Created:
2004-09-18 12:30:14 UTC
Size:
4.24 KB
patch
obsolete
>--- book.sgml Fri Sep 17 19:45:34 2004 >+++ new.book.sgml Sat Sep 18 13:06:17 2004 >@@ -7169,8 +7169,9 @@ > > <para>The X Window System is the most widely available windowing system > capable of running on &unix; or &unix; like systems, including >- &os;. <ulink url= "http://www.x.org">X.org</ulink> administers >- the <ulink url="http://www.x.org/X11_protocol.html">X protocol >+ &os;. <ulink url= "http://www.x.org">The X.Org >+ Foundation</ulink> administers the <ulink >+ url="http://www.x.org/X11_protocol.html">X protocol > standards</ulink>. The current release of the specification > is 11.6, so you will often see references shortened to > <literal>X11R6</literal> or even just <literal>X11</literal>. >@@ -7196,7 +7197,7 @@ > &xfree86; which is maintained by > <ulink url="http://www.xfree86.org">The XFree86 Project, > Inc.</ulink> This software was installed by default on >- &os; versions up until 4.10 and 5.2. Although X.org >+ &os; versions up until 4.10 and 5.2. Although &xorg; > itself maintained an implementation during that time > period, it was basically only provided as a reference > platform, as it had suffered greatly from bitrot over >@@ -7206,7 +7207,7 @@ > that project > over issues including the pace of code changes, future > directions, and interpersonal conflicts, and are now contributing >- code directly to X.org instead. At that time, X.org updated its >+ code directly to &xorg; instead. At that time, &xorg; updated its > source tree to the last &xfree86; release before its subsequent > licensing change (<application>XFree86 version 4.3.99.903</application>), incorporated > many changes that had previously been maintained separately, >@@ -7217,11 +7218,11 @@ > offload more work onto the graphics cards (with the goal of > increased performance) and make it more modular > (with the goal of increased maintainability, and thus faster >- releases as well as easier configuration). X.org intends to >+ releases as well as easier configuration). &xorg; intends to > incorporate the freedesktop.org changes in its future releases.</para> > > <para>As of July 2004, in &os.current;, >- &xfree86; has been replaced with X.org as the default >+ &xfree86; has been replaced with &xorg; as the default > implementation. The &xfree86; ports > (<filename role="package">x11/XFree86-4</filename> and > subports) remain in the ports collection and are still >@@ -7243,8 +7244,8 @@ > <note> > <para>The following paragraphs refer to the > &xfree86; implementation, but most should also be applicable >- to the X.org implementation as well. While the default >- configuration filename for the X.org implementation is >+ to the &xorg; implementation as well. While the default >+ configuration filename for the &xorg; implementation is > <filename>xorg.conf</filename>, it will search for > <filename>XF86Config</filename> if it cannot find it.</para> > </note> >@@ -7253,11 +7254,11 @@ > > <qandaentry> > <question id="xorg-compatibility"> >- <para>Will my existing applications run with the X.org suite?</para> >+ <para>Will my existing applications run with the &xorg; suite?</para> > </question> > > <answer> >- <para>The X.org software is written to the same X11R6 specification >+ <para>The &xorg; software is written to the same X11R6 specification > that &xfree86; is, so basic applications should work > unchanged. A few lesser-used protocols have been deprecated > (<literal>XIE</literal>, <literal>PEX</literal>, and >@@ -7283,11 +7284,11 @@ > > <qandaentry> > <question id="why-choose-xorg"> >- <para>Why did &os; choose to go with the X.org ports by default?</para> >+ <para>Why did &os; choose to go with the &xorg; ports by default?</para> > </question> > > <answer> >- <para>The X.org developers claim that their goal is to release >+ <para>The &xorg; developers claim that their goal is to release > more often and incorporate new features more quickly. If they > are able to do so, this will be very attractive. Also, their > software still uses the traditional X license, while &xfree86;
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Diff
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
|
Diff
Attachments on
bug 71862
: 46867