FreeBSD Bugzilla – Attachment 51271 Details for
Bug 77925
[PATCH] www/en/docproj/sgml.sgml: The FDP no longer uses LinuxDoc
Home
|
New
|
Browse
|
Search
|
[?]
|
Reports
|
Help
|
New Account
|
Log In
Remember
[x]
|
Forgot Password
Login:
[x]
[patch]
sgml.diff
sgml.diff (text/plain), 2.74 KB, created by
Jesus R.Camou
on 2005-02-22 13:50:25 UTC
(
hide
)
Description:
sgml.diff
Filename:
MIME Type:
Creator:
Jesus R.Camou
Created:
2005-02-22 13:50:25 UTC
Size:
2.74 KB
patch
obsolete
>Index: sgml.sgml >=================================================================== >RCS file: /home/ncvs/www/en/docproj/sgml.sgml,v >retrieving revision 1.23 >diff -u -r1.23 sgml.sgml >--- sgml.sgml 1 Apr 2004 19:32:56 -0000 1.23 >+++ sgml.sgml 22 Feb 2005 13:36:17 -0000 >@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > <p>The Documentation Project uses SGML as the standard method > of representing the documentation.</p> > >- <p>SGML is the <b>S</b>tandard <b>G</b>eneralised <b>M</b>arkup >+ <p>SGML is the <b>S</b>tandard <b>G</b>eneralized <b>M</b>arkup > <b>L</b>anguage.</p> > > <p>In a nutshell (and apologies to any SGML purists in the audience that >@@ -24,16 +24,12 @@ > defined using SGML.</p> > > <p>There are many, many markup languages that are defined using SGML. HTML >- is one of them. Another is called "LinuxDoc". As you can probably guess, >- it was originally created by the Linux documentation group to write >- their documentation, and the FreeBSD Documentation Project adopted it as >- well.</p> >- >- <p>Another markup language defined using SGML is called "DocBook". This >- is a language designed specifically for writing technical >- documentation, and as such it has many tags (the things inside the >- <...>) to describe technical documentation related things.</p> >- >+ is one of them. Another is called "DocBook". This is a language designed >+ specifically for writing technical documentation, and as such it has many >+ tags (the things inside the <...>) to describe technical >+ documentation related things. The FreeBSD Documentation Project adopted >+ it and added some new elements to make it more precise.</p> >+ > <p>For example, this is how you might write a brief paragraph in HTML > (do not worry about the content, just look at the tags):</p> > >@@ -101,16 +97,12 @@ > <li><p>The conversion process is not that simple.</p></li> > </ul> > >- <p>Right now, the Project is still using LinuxDoc for the Handbook and the >- FAQ. That's changing, and in particular there's a project underway >- to convert the documentation to DocBook.</p> >- >- <h2>What if you don't know LinuxDoc/DocBook? Can you still >+ <h2>What if you do not know DocBook? Can you still > contribute?</h2> > > <p>Yes you can. Quite definitely. Any documentation is better than no >- documentation. If you've got some documentation to contribute and it's >- not marked up in LinuxDoc or DocBook, don't worry.</p> >+ documentation. If you have got some documentation to contribute and it is >+ not marked up in DocBook, do not worry.</p> > > <p><a href="submitting.html">Submit</a> the documentation as > normal. Someone else on the Project will grab your committed
You cannot view the attachment while viewing its details because your browser does not support IFRAMEs.
View the attachment on a separate page
.
View Attachment As Diff
View Attachment As Raw
Actions:
View
|
Diff
Attachments on
bug 77925
: 51271