View | Details | Raw Unified | Return to bug 96749 | Differences between
and this patch

Collapse All | Expand All

(-)/usr/ports/www/apache20/files/patch-srclib:apr-util:build:dbm.m4 (-16 / +13 lines)
Lines 1-5 Link Here
1
--- srclib/apr-util/build/dbm.m4.orig	Sun Jan 16 18:27:07 2005
1
--- srclib/apr-util/build/dbm.m4.orig	Thu Feb  9 12:26:28 2006
2
+++ srclib/apr-util/build/dbm.m4	Sat Feb  5 12:14:28 2005
2
+++ srclib/apr-util/build/dbm.m4	Tue May  2 16:40:06 2006
3
@@ -298,8 +298,8 @@
3
@@ -298,8 +298,8 @@
4
   fi
4
   fi
5
   APU_CHECK_BERKELEY_DB(1, -1, -1,
5
   APU_CHECK_BERKELEY_DB(1, -1, -1,
Lines 42-48 Link Here
42
   )
42
   )
43
   if test "$apu_have_db" = "1"; then
43
   if test "$apu_have_db" = "1"; then
44
     apu_db_version=4
44
     apu_db_version=4
45
@@ -403,13 +403,14 @@
45
@@ -403,8 +403,8 @@
46
   fi
46
   fi
47
   APU_CHECK_BERKELEY_DB("4", "2", "-1",
47
   APU_CHECK_BERKELEY_DB("4", "2", "-1",
48
     "$places",
48
     "$places",
Lines 53-65 Link Here
53
   )
53
   )
54
   if test "$apu_have_db" = "1"; then
54
   if test "$apu_have_db" = "1"; then
55
     apu_db_version=4
55
     apu_db_version=4
56
   fi
56
@@ -422,8 +422,8 @@
57
 ])
58
+
59
 dnl
60
 dnl APU_CHECK_DB43: is DB4.3 present?
61
 dnl
62
@@ -422,8 +423,8 @@
63
   fi
57
   fi
64
   APU_CHECK_BERKELEY_DB("4", "3", "-1",
58
   APU_CHECK_BERKELEY_DB("4", "3", "-1",
65
     "$places",
59
     "$places",
Lines 70-80 Link Here
70
   )
64
   )
71
   if test "$apu_have_db" = "1"; then
65
   if test "$apu_have_db" = "1"; then
72
     apu_db_version=4
66
     apu_db_version=4
73
@@ -524,6 +525,7 @@
67
@@ -441,8 +441,8 @@
74
       fi
75
     fi
76
   fi
68
   fi
77
+
69
   APU_CHECK_BERKELEY_DB("4", "4", "-1",
78
   AC_MSG_CHECKING(for Berkeley DB)
70
     "$places",
71
-    "db44/db.h db4/db.h db.h",
72
-    "db-4.4 db4-4.4 db44 db4 db"
73
+    "db44/db.h",
74
+    "db-4.4"
75
   )
79
   if test "$apu_have_db" = "1"; then
76
   if test "$apu_have_db" = "1"; then
80
     AC_MSG_RESULT(found db$apu_db_version)
77
     apu_db_version=4

Return to bug 96749