Bug 100312

Summary: Small blurb in explaining-bsd article
Product: Documentation Reporter: Aasmund Eikli <inter>
Component: Books & ArticlesAssignee: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me    
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   

Description Aasmund Eikli 2006-07-14 23:00:44 UTC
	I was skimming the explaining-bsd article and it occured to me that in it's points on which OS to use it doesn't mention
	any documentation effort. I included a small addition to the list.

Fix: I suppose this is a test patch to see if I did this right. Sorry if I messed up. 



<listitem>
+         <para>BSD projects have a large emphasis on good documentation. The various
+           documentation projects aim to provide actively updated documentation in many languages
+           covering all aspects of the individual BSD system.
+       </listitem>
+
+       <listitem>
          <para>The BSD license may be more attractive than the GPL.</para>
        </listitem>--HYl5vUPrZpTStfFTaunaZHRexNH4ak4MD9dEUgf5RufGt0Uu
Content-Type: text/plain; name="file.diff"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="file.diff"

--- article.sgml.old    Fri Jul 14 23:22:07 2006
+++ article.sgml        Fri Jul 14 23:32:52 2006
@@ -547,6 +547,12 @@
        </listitem>
How-To-Repeat: n/a
Comment 1 Giorgos Keramidas freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-07-15 01:24:28 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

I just committed a slightly modified version of the patch. 
The web interface to the CVS repository seems to be temporarily 
misbehaving, so I'm pasting the diff output here: 

%         <listitem> 
% +         <para>BSD projects have a better reputation for the quality and 
% +           completeness of their documentation.. The various documentation 
% +           projects aim to provide actively updated documentation, in many 
% +           languages, and covering all aspects of the system.</para> 
% +       </listitem> 

Wording changes here and there and a missing </para> are the 
changes I made. 

You wrote: 
> I suppose this is a test patch to see if I did this right. Sorry if I 
> messed up. 

You didn't mess up at all.  Thanks for the patch :) 



Comment 2 Giorgos Keramidas freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-07-15 01:24:28 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-doc->keramida