| Summary: | [PATCH] sysutils/e2fsprogs: clean-up | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Alejandro Pulver <alepulver> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Alejandro Pulver <alepulver> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Alejandro Pulver
2007-09-11 19:20:06 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->alepulver Submitter has GNATS access State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainers feedback Hi Alejandro, please do not mix formatting changes with functional changes in the same patch, that makes it hard to read. I object to some parts: 1. apparently the pkg-install->pkg-plist revision now expects or installs e2fsck into /usr/sbin, where it used to be in /sbin before. This can break existing setups that call fsck from /etc/fstab if /usr isn't mounted soon enough. 2. there are lots of unnecessary "quiet" options (leading @ in rules) in the Makefile that I cannot accept. Please close this PR, I'll supersede ports/116230 with a merged version of this PR (ports/116286) and ports/116230. Sorry for not taking your patch directly. Best regards Matthias Oh, there's one more point: the "direct inclusion" leads to package bloat, because then the somewhat largish e2fsck is included twice. We might consider @exec however but I don't see much of a difference to pkg-install then. Best Matthias Please close this one and use ports/116434 instead. Thanks. State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Obsoleted by 116434. |