| Summary: | [patch] wrong signatures in d2i_RSAPublicKey man pages | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Pietro Cerutti <gahr> | ||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | simon | ||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Pietro Cerutti
2007-12-20 20:40:00 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-doc Reclassify. On 2007.12.20 21:30:34 +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > the signatures for the following functions: > > d2i_RSAPublicKey > d2i_RSA_PUBKEY > d2i_RSAPrivateKey > d2i_Netscape_RSA > > are wrong in our man pages. [...] The manual pages are actually generated from the upstream POD documentation (openssl/doc/crypto/d2i_RSAPublicKey.pod) so the changes need to be made to the POD files. Otherwise they will simply vanish after next import. Any chance you could submit the changes directly to the OpenSSL project [1]? Then we would get the fixes when the next version of OpenSSL is imported. Does the source changes fix actual bugs or is it just style/warning? If they don't fix real bugs I would prefer for them also to go via OpenSSL to not divert from upstream more than needed. [1] http://www.openssl.org/support/rt.html -- Simon L. Nielsen Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2007.12.20 21:30:34 +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: > >> the signatures for the following functions: >> >> d2i_RSAPublicKey >> d2i_RSA_PUBKEY >> d2i_RSAPrivateKey >> d2i_Netscape_RSA >> >> are wrong in our man pages. > > [...] > > The manual pages are actually generated from the upstream POD > documentation (openssl/doc/crypto/d2i_RSAPublicKey.pod) so the changes > need to be made to the POD files. Otherwise they will simply vanish > after next import. Please look at [2] for a patch to the POD file. > > Any chance you could submit the changes directly to the OpenSSL > project [1]? Then we would get the fixes when the next version of > OpenSSL is imported. I've already CC'ed openssl-dev on the original PR submit. I will fill a bug report on their Request Tracker. > > Does the source changes fix actual bugs or is it just style/warning? > If they don't fix real bugs I would prefer for them also to go via > OpenSSL to not divert from upstream more than needed. The last one in the .diff file adds const'ness to a variable declaration, which I find quite important. The other ones simply remove useless casts. [2] http://www.gahr.ch/FreeBSD/patches/118902_d2i_RSAPublicKey.pod.diff -- Pietro Cerutti PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp State Changed From-To: open->closed This was fixed upstream: http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1626 |