Bug 12823
| Summary: | [PATCH] New FAQ Entry: "What is a sandbox?" | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | jobaldwi <jobaldwi> | ||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | Jesus <jesusr> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
jobaldwi
1999-07-26 23:50:00 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-doc->jesusr Working it. On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 03:41:29PM -0700, jobaldwi@vt.edu wrote: > + > + <p>Every UNIX process is completely firewalled off from every > + other UNIX process. One process can modify the address space > + of another. This is unlike Windows where a process can easily > + overwrite the address space of any other, leading to a crash. > + Oops, wasn't this identified as a typo? IIRC a "not" was omitted: One process cannot modify the address space of another. -- Regards, -*Sue*- On 26-Jul-99 Sue Blake wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 1999 at 03:41:29PM -0700, jobaldwi@vt.edu wrote: > >> + >> + <p>Every UNIX process is completely firewalled off from every >> + other UNIX process. One process can modify the address space >> + of another. This is unlike Windows where a process can easily >> + overwrite the address space of any other, leading to a crash. >> + > > Oops, wasn't this identified as a typo? IIRC a "not" was omitted: > One process cannot modify the address space of another. Yes.. *hangs head*... > Regards, > -*Sue*- --- John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu> -- http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/ PGP Key: http://members.freedomnet.com/~jbaldwin/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.freebsd.org State Changed From-To: open->closed Commited, thanks! . |
