| Summary: | [PATCH] incorrect wakeup argument in atapi_free() | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | Vsevolod Lobko <seva> | ||||
| Component: | i386 | Assignee: | Luoqi Chen <luoqi> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | 4.0-CURRENT | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Vsevolod Lobko
1999-08-30 13:40:01 UTC
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:34:17 +0300, Vsevolod Lobko wrote:
> When using block devices system places many concurent commands for
> device
Do you find the same poor performance with the now ata driver?
Ciao,
Sheldon.
On Mon, 30 Aug 1999, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:34:17 +0300, Vsevolod Lobko wrote:
>
> > When using block devices system places many concurent commands for
> > device
>
> Do you find the same poor performance with the now ata driver?
I don't check this.
I need working atapi support on stable branch :)) (It's an embedded
system)
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-bugs->luoqi Luoqi, could you take a look at this? The originator's using STABLE, despite the Environment: field in the PR. State Changed From-To: open->closed Fix committed. |