| Summary: | FreeBSD cvsweb reporting inaccurate logs? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Ryan Beasley <ryanb> |
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Ryan Beasley
2009-06-11 05:50:01 UTC
State Changed From-To: open->feedback I think this is because the way the product works. CVS head tracking what you see when you open cvsweb, is not listing version information for branched items. It track's its own tree, unless you specify a specific different revision, which you can do on the bottom part of the webpage presented. Annotate works a bit differently and shows the changed lines and queries a bit different, which is why there are different results. In my opinion this will not be corrected at anytime soon, it had been in use for a long period of time, and no one actually had problems with that. In other words the current situation works just fine. Thanks I think it a problem, as originator says. I cannot confirm easily whether the recent changes in -current or -stable are incorporated to the -stable or more older -stable such as 6.x. viewvc interface can show all, but it is not convenient for the purpose mentioned above. I want it to be fixed. Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-www->webmaster Reassign. Not a documentation problem. But rather a problem with one of the CGI scripts running in the background. Responsible Changed From-To: webmaster->freebsd-www FreeBSD.org CGI scripts are not maintained but webmaster by like the rest of the site by -www people. It's a known limit of cvsweb that it gets confused by certain CVS based files as the content of some log comments are very similar to the structure of the 'cvs log' output which cvsweb uses. State Changed From-To: feedback->closed As mentioned by Simon, it's a known issue. |