Bug 136645
| Summary: | Add a line to the devel/allegro-devel port | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Eitan Adler <eadler> |
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Beat Gaetzi <beat> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Eitan Adler
2009-07-10 22:20:01 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->beat I'll take it. State Changed From-To: open->feedback Shouldn't the PORTSCOUT-variable be set to limit:^4.3.[0-9]* ? After looking at some other ports here is the current diff (with some more recent portlint changes) --- Makefile.old 2009-07-10 17:17:17.000000000 -0400 +++ Makefile 2009-07-13 08:10:43.000000000 -0400 @@ -75,10 +75,10 @@ .endif .if !defined(WITHOUT_DEVEL) -INSTALL_TARGET= full-install install-man install-info +INSTALL_TARGET= full-install install-man PLIST_SUB+= DEVEL="" .else -INSTALL_TARGET= mini-install install-man install-info +INSTALL_TARGET= mini-install install-man PLIST_SUB+= DEVEL="@comment " .endif @@ -158,4 +158,6 @@ . endfor .endif +PORTSCOUT=limit:^0\.3.[0-9]* + .include <bsd.port.post.mk> -- Eitan Adler "Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave." -Jakob Nielsen Eitan Adler wrote: > After looking at some other ports here is the current diff (with some > more recent portlint changes) > > --- Makefile.old 2009-07-10 17:17:17.000000000 -0400 > +++ Makefile 2009-07-13 08:10:43.000000000 -0400 > @@ -75,10 +75,10 @@ > .endif > > .if !defined(WITHOUT_DEVEL) > -INSTALL_TARGET= full-install install-man install-info > +INSTALL_TARGET= full-install install-man > PLIST_SUB+= DEVEL="" > .else > -INSTALL_TARGET= mini-install install-man install-info > +INSTALL_TARGET= mini-install install-man > PLIST_SUB+= DEVEL="@comment " > .endif > > @@ -158,4 +158,6 @@ > . endfor > .endif > > +PORTSCOUT=limit:^0\.3.[0-9]* > + > .include <bsd.port.post.mk> Port fails to build with the removal of install-info: http://people.freebsd.org/~beat/logs/136645/allegro-devel-4.3.1_3.log Should I back out the portlint change and commit the PORTSCOUT variable or would you like to take a look at this problem? Beat Beat Gaetzi wrote: > Eitan Adler wrote: >> After looking at some other ports here is the current diff (with some >> more recent portlint changes) >> >> --- Makefile.old 2009-07-10 17:17:17.000000000 -0400 >> +++ Makefile 2009-07-13 08:10:43.000000000 -0400 >> @@ -75,10 +75,10 @@ >> .endif >> >> .if !defined(WITHOUT_DEVEL) >> -INSTALL_TARGET= full-install install-man install-info >> +INSTALL_TARGET= full-install install-man >> PLIST_SUB+= DEVEL="" >> .else >> -INSTALL_TARGET= mini-install install-man install-info >> +INSTALL_TARGET= mini-install install-man >> PLIST_SUB+= DEVEL="@comment " >> .endif >> >> @@ -158,4 +158,6 @@ >> . endfor >> .endif >> >> +PORTSCOUT=limit:^0\.3.[0-9]* >> + >> .include <bsd.port.post.mk> > > Port fails to build with the removal of install-info: > http://people.freebsd.org/~beat/logs/136645/allegro-devel-4.3.1_3.log > > Should I back out the portlint change and commit the PORTSCOUT variable > or would you like to take a look at this problem? Do the first for now. I must say that It Works For Me (tm) when I remove the install-info line. I will however read the logs and see what the difference between my ports and your logs are. > > Beat > -- Eitan Adler "Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave." -Jakob Nielsen beat 2009-07-16 19:42:39 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
devel/allegro-devel Makefile
Log:
- Add PORTSCOUT variable
PR: ports/136645
Submitted by: Eitan Adler <EitanAdlerList AT gmail.com> (maintainer)
Revision Changes Path
1.36 +2 -0 ports/devel/allegro-devel/Makefile
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Committed. Thanks! |