Bug 14175
| Summary: | route for ip aliasing | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | jch <jch> |
| Component: | bin | Assignee: | freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
jch
1999-10-07 09:20:01 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-alpha->freebsd-bugs Misfiled PR Jean-Claude wrote:
> I add an alias on my network interface (de0), and when I do a
> 'netstat -rn' I dont have the complete route.
> I've
> 192.168.1 instead of 192.168.1.0
> perhaps it's normal....
> I add an alias on my network interface (de0), and when I do a
> 'netstat -rn' I dont have the complete route.
> I've
> 192.168.1 instead of 192.168.1.0
> perhaps it's normal....
I believe that this is a normal output result (do to conversion
through inet_netof(3), perhaps?).
Tony.
State Changed From-To: open->closed Asked and answered. ru@FreeBSD.ORG writes: > Synopsis: route for ip aliasing > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: ru > State-Changed-When: Thu Jun 7 07:00:15 PDT 2001 > State-Changed-Why: > Asked and answered. Actual I think not good idea support different address schemes for netstat -r and route(8) utilites: # route add 10.0.0.0/16 192.168.14.1 add net 10.0.0.0: gateway 192.168.14.1 # netstat -rn | egrep \^10 10/16 192.168.14.1 UGSc 0 0 fxp0 # route delete 10/16 route: writing to routing socket: No such process delete net 10: not in table # route delete 10.0.0.0/16 delete net 10.0.0.0 # if netstat deal with addreses like 10/16, I think route need to deal with them too. -- TSB Russian Express, Moscow Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru Thanks for reminding! Fixed in route.c,v 1.46 and route.8,v 1.24. On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:23:31PM +0400, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > ru@FreeBSD.ORG writes: > > Synopsis: route for ip aliasing > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > State-Changed-By: ru > > State-Changed-When: Thu Jun 7 07:00:15 PDT 2001 > > State-Changed-Why: > > Asked and answered. > > Actual I think not good idea support different address schemes for > netstat -r and route(8) utilites: > > # route add 10.0.0.0/16 192.168.14.1 > add net 10.0.0.0: gateway 192.168.14.1 > # netstat -rn | egrep \^10 > 10/16 192.168.14.1 UGSc 0 0 fxp0 > # route delete 10/16 > route: writing to routing socket: No such process > delete net 10: not in table > # route delete 10.0.0.0/16 > delete net 10.0.0.0 > # > > if netstat deal with addreses like 10/16, I think route need to deal > with them too. > > -- > TSB Russian Express, Moscow > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age Ruslan Ermilov writes: > Thanks for reminding! > Fixed in route.c,v 1.46 and route.8,v 1.24. May be allow similar semantic in ifconfig too ? ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1/28 instead of ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.240 ? > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:23:31PM +0400, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > > ru@FreeBSD.ORG writes: > > > Synopsis: route for ip aliasing > > > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > > State-Changed-By: ru > > > State-Changed-When: Thu Jun 7 07:00:15 PDT 2001 > > > State-Changed-Why: > > > Asked and answered. > > > > Actual I think not good idea support different address schemes for > > netstat -r and route(8) utilites: > > > > # route add 10.0.0.0/16 192.168.14.1 > > add net 10.0.0.0: gateway 192.168.14.1 > > # netstat -rn | egrep \^10 > > 10/16 192.168.14.1 UGSc 0 0 fxp0 > > # route delete 10/16 > > route: writing to routing socket: No such process > > delete net 10: not in table > > # route delete 10.0.0.0/16 > > delete net 10.0.0.0 > > # > > > > if netstat deal with addreses like 10/16, I think route need to deal > > with them too. > > > > -- > > TSB Russian Express, Moscow > > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru > > -- > Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, > ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, > ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine > > http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age > -- TSB Russian Express, Moscow Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > Thanks for reminding! > > Fixed in route.c,v 1.46 and route.8,v 1.24. > > May be allow similar semantic in ifconfig too ? > > ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1/28 > instead of > ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.240 > ? instead of, no. It's important to let the actual configuration parameters of ifconfig. However, add the prefix in the parameters of ifconfig can be consider as a different way to set the mask and should be appreciate. > > > On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 06:23:31PM +0400, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > > > ru@FreeBSD.ORG writes: > > > > Synopsis: route for ip aliasing > > > > > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > > > State-Changed-By: ru > > > > State-Changed-When: Thu Jun 7 07:00:15 PDT 2001 > > > > State-Changed-Why: > > > > Asked and answered. > > > > > > Actual I think not good idea support different address schemes for > > > netstat -r and route(8) utilites: > > > > > > # route add 10.0.0.0/16 192.168.14.1 > > > add net 10.0.0.0: gateway 192.168.14.1 > > > # netstat -rn | egrep \^10 > > > 10/16 192.168.14.1 UGSc 0 0 fxp0 > > > # route delete 10/16 > > > route: writing to routing socket: No such process > > > delete net 10: not in table > > > # route delete 10.0.0.0/16 > > > delete net 10.0.0.0 > > > # > > > > > > if netstat deal with addreses like 10/16, I think route need to deal > > > with them too. > > > > > > -- > > > TSB Russian Express, Moscow > > > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru > > > > -- > > Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, > > ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, > > ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > > +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine > > > > http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > > http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age > > > > -- > TSB Russian Express, Moscow > Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru -- Jean-Claude Christophe / jch@oleane.net Jean-Claude Christophe writes: > > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > > Thanks for reminding! > > > Fixed in route.c,v 1.46 and route.8,v 1.24. > > > > May be allow similar semantic in ifconfig too ? > > > > ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1/28 > > instead of > > ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.240 > > ? > > instead of, no. > It's important to let the actual configuration parameters of ifconfig. > However, add the prefix in the parameters of ifconfig can be consider > as a different way to set the mask and should be appreciate. Of course, I mean only one more possible way. -- TSB Russian Express, Moscow Vladimir B. Grebenschikov, vova@express.ru On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:23:58PM +0400, Vladimir B. Grebenschikov wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov writes: > > Thanks for reminding! > > Fixed in route.c,v 1.46 and route.8,v 1.24. > > May be allow similar semantic in ifconfig too ? > > ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1/28 > instead of > ifconfig if0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.240 > ? > It's already available in 5.0-CURRENT and 4.3-STABLE. With the exception that the syntax for ifconfig(8) is host/mask. Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age |
