Bug 14567
| Summary: | camcontrol(8) sez to see cam(9) and xpt(9) but there ain't no such | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg> |
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > >Fix: > > ? Create a cam(9) man page ? Yes please. You can send the patches as a reply to this PR. I've been meaning to figure out what to document, but if you're willing to do it, I will accept, review (and have Ken review) and commit the pages. -- |Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> |If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some. `--------------------------------------------------------------------- In message <19991027195523.F70024@holly.calldei.com>, you wrote: >On Wed, Oct 27, 1999, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> >Fix: >> >> ? Create a cam(9) man page ? > > Yes please. You can send the patches as a reply to this PR. >I've been meaning to figure out what to document, but if you're >willing to do it, I will accept, review (and have Ken review) >and commit the pages. Umm.... I'd love to help out. Really. But given that I don't have the foggiest idea what `cam' even is, I don't think that I'm the proper person to be doing this particular task. On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 06:00:02PM -0700, Chris Costello wrote: > > ? Create a cam(9) man page ? > > Yes please. You can send the patches as a reply to this PR. > I've been meaning to figure out what to document, but if you're > willing to do it, I will accept, review (and have Ken review) > and commit the pages. cam(4) and xpt(4) exist. My assumption is that camcontrol(8) should refer to these, and the (9) was a mistake? -- Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu> * UNIX is a lever for the http://www.pobox.com/~mph/ * intellect. -J.R. Mashey Matthew Hunt wrote... > On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 06:00:02PM -0700, Chris Costello wrote: > > > > ? Create a cam(9) man page ? > > > > Yes please. You can send the patches as a reply to this PR. > > I've been meaning to figure out what to document, but if you're > > willing to do it, I will accept, review (and have Ken review) > > and commit the pages. > > cam(4) and xpt(4) exist. My assumption is that camcontrol(8) > should refer to these, and the (9) was a mistake? Yes, camcontrol(8) should refer to cam(4) and xpt(4). As for the xpt(9) and cam(9) references, look in the BUGS section of the camcontrol(8) man page: BUGS Most of the man page cross references don't exist yet. This will be fixed soon. Of course, it's been over a year, and I haven't had time to write cam(9) or xpt(9). If the missing cross-references are causing problems, go ahead and take them out, but make sure you take out the paragraph from the BUGS section as well. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org State Changed From-To: open->closed I have added cam(4) and xpt(4) to SEE ALSO, deleted cam(9) and xpt(9) which do not exist, and deleted the BUGS statement which says they'll be added soon. |
The camcontrol(8) man page sez: SEE ALSO cam(3), cam_cdbparse(3), pass(4), cam(9), xpt(9) ^^^^^^ ^^^^^^ Unfortunately, `man 9 cam' produces only: No entry for cam in section 9 of the manual Likewise for `man 9 xpt'. Fix: ? Create a cam(9) man page ? How-To-Repeat: man 9 cam man 9 xpt