| Summary: | /dev/lpt0 doesn't work unless/until you do `lptcontrol -e' | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | Ronald F. Guilmette <rfg> |
| Component: | kern | Assignee: | freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | 3.3-RELEASE | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Ronald F. Guilmette
1999-11-08 22:10:01 UTC
Thank-you for the lpt and FreeBSD 3.x work-around for HP printers that you posted in the FreeBSD bugs database. I don' t have a fix, but I believe the problem is at least partially found in flow control. I could print small files and small postscipts (< 10k) without requiring your suggestion, but larger files gives the HP error code 22 (basically a data overrun). I had problems with the new serial driver too for this printer. --mark tinguely I did some more research looking at the interrupt code and finally at the probe/attach code of the ppc driver and found that the kernel configure flags of 0x40 used in the GENERIC kernel configuration file (and I have been using to make my kernels) affects the detection of the ppc chipset which also affects the ability of the interrupt code. Removing the "flags 0x40" from the kernel configuration file and making a new kernel, also removed my problems with the HP PS printer in interupt mode. I think the "flags 0x40" should be removed from the GENERIC kernel configuration file. --mark tinguely. On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:50:02 MST, mark tinguely wrote: > Removing the "flags 0x40" from the kernel configuration file and > making a new kernel, also removed my problems with the HP PS printer > in interupt mode. I think the "flags 0x40" should be removed from > the GENERIC kernel configuration file. So in other words, _enabling_ chipset detection for ppc(4) resolved your problem? The problem with removing this from GENERIC is that the BUGS section of the manual page suggests that chipset detection causes problems for some people. Therefore, enabling the detection by default is going to cause problems for other people, even though it would solve the problem for you. Unless someone suggests that the existing default causes problems for more people than your proposed default would, I'd suggest that we leave GENERIC as it is. That said, if you'd like to draft a new FAQ entry for this, I'm sure the freebsd-doc guys would be happy to incorporate it. By the way, have you seen this FAQ entry? http://www.FreeBSD.org/FAQ/troubleshoot.html#AEN1554 Ciao, Sheldon. State Changed From-To: open->feedback Waiting to hear what Ronald has to say about Mark's input. State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Ronald isn't in a position to track this further and is convinced that the problem related to specific hardware which he no longer has available. While that doesn't mean there isn't some problem to be solved, this PR isn't going to help us solve it any more. Thanks for the feedback, Ronald. |