| Summary: | Intel Etherexpress Pro timeouts when >1 card present | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | lyndon <lyndon> |
| Component: | kern | Assignee: | freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
lyndon
1999-11-24 17:20:00 UTC
On Wed, 24 Nov 1999 lyndon@bsd4us.org wrote: > intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100B Ethernet (one on intel n440bx2 > board, other as PCI expansion). platform is a VAResearch VAR-501, > dual pIII stepping 2 500mHz, 512mb RAM. When only one card is > ifconfig'd up and link up, everything is great. try and bring up > the other card, and within 36 hours both interfaces stop > responding. error on console: Interesting. I currently have a large Compaq server with 6 Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100 and 1 Dual Intel EtherExpress Pro 10/100 -- for a total of 8 interfaces -- running 3.3-STABLE (and initally was running 3.3-RELEASE, as you are) with no problems at all. See my paragraph below, however. > server /kernel: fxp1: device timeout > server /kernel: fxp0: device timeout > repeatedly until reboot. > the only kernel changes are as follows: > maxusers 120 (changed from 32) > options SMP (uncommented to build SMP) > options APIC_IO (uncommented to build SMP) > options NBUS=2 (uncommented to build SMP) I do recall having some kind of interrupt-related problem which caused many of the interfaces to stop working when I temporarily added a second processor to the machine to play with SMP. Try using a non-SMP kernel and see if that fixes the problem. You may even have to remove the additional processor(s) entirely to fix the problem. If there indeed is a problem related to SMP here, I'm sure some of the developers would love to know about it. Don't ask me though, that certainly isn't my area of expertise. :-) -- Chris Dillon - cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us - cdillon@inter-linc.net FreeBSD: The fastest and most stable server OS on the planet. For Intel x86 and Alpha architectures (SPARC under development). ( http://www.freebsd.org ) "One should admire Windows users. It takes a great deal of courage to trust Windows with your data." I'm experiencing this problem with 4.0-STABLE. I have four Dell PowerEdge 2450s, each with one interface on the main board and a dual-port card. Only one interface can be used at a time. Can the priority be increased on this PR? This configuration is probably a common one. -- Andrew J. Korty, Principal Security Engineer Office of the Vice President for Information Technology Indiana University State Changed From-To: open->feedback Does this problem still occur in newer versions of FreeBSD, such as 4.3-RELEASE? State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Originator is unable to test with a newer versions of FreeBSD. There have been a lot of changes to the fxp driver since this PR was created, so it's probable this problem has been solved. If this is still a problem with a newer version of FreeBSD, a new PR should be opened. |