Summary: | [patch] net/asterisk using 100% cpu with .call files | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Alexander Brovikov <alexander> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody) <ports-bugs> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
Priority: | Normal | ||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Alexander Brovikov
2010-11-30 08:50:09 UTC
Maintainer of net/asterisk, Please note that PR ports/152700 has just been submitted. If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch and a committer will take care of it. The full text of the PR can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/152700 -- Edwin Groothuis via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool edwin@FreeBSD.org State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainers feedback (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) Hi Max, can you please commit the attached patch to net/asterisk as a workaround to digium bug 18089. This will be in 1.8.1. Thanks, Florian -- Florian Smeets Florian, On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Florian Smeets <flo@smeets.im> wrote: > can you please commit the attached patch to net/asterisk as a workaround > to digium bug 18089. This will be in 1.8.1. > Are you sure that the reference to Digium bug id is correct? https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18089 Max On 30.11.10 16:55, Max Khon wrote:
> Florian,
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Florian Smeets <flo@smeets.im> wrote:
>
>
>> can you please commit the attached patch to net/asterisk as a workaround
>> to digium bug 18089. This will be in 1.8.1.
>>
>
> Are you sure that the reference to Digium bug id is correct?
> https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18089
>
The patch is the one attached to that bug id, and Alexander said the
patch fixes his problem. He also mentioned it in his original message.
So i guess, yes.
However for me it would be OK to just wait for 1.8.1.
Cheers,
Florian
--
Florian Smeets
Yes, with this patch all works ok for me. While inotify is linux-only lib, apparently, at some point in time call-file mechanism was broken (there were several bugs related) and fixed (finally?) with this patch. State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Committed, thanks! fjoe 2010-11-30 17:06:42 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: net/asterisk Makefile Added files: net/asterisk/files patch-pbx__pbx_spool.c Log: Fix 100% CPU use with .call files (upstream issue https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18089) The patch will be included in asterisk 1.8.1. PR: 152700 Submitted by: Florian Smeets (MAINTAINER) Revision Changes Path 1.132 +1 -0 ports/net/asterisk/Makefile 1.1 +240 -0 ports/net/asterisk/files/patch-pbx__pbx_spool.c (new) _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" |