Bug 155526
| Summary: | [PATCH] devel/py-elementtree: ignore if python >= 2.5 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | R.Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-python (Nobody) <python> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
R.Mahmatkhanov
2011-03-13 13:20:11 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-python Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) State Changed From-To: open->closed python24 goes to the end of month, this port is on the todo for removal. thx. State Changed From-To: closed->open Re-open, python24 failed to disappear As long as www/py-Products.TinyMCE depends on it, there is no way to
delete it (without fixing www/py-Products.TinyMCE beforehand for python
>= 2.5).
Also, as it does not do any harm (no package name confusion with
xml.etree.elementTree and _elementtree), it is not really necessary to
force the deletion of it.
Cheers
Marcus
Marcus von Appen wrote on 07.06.2012 19:39: > As long as www/py-Products.TinyMCE depends on it, there is no way to > delete it (without fixing www/py-Products.TinyMCE beforehand for python >> = 2.5). > > Also, as it does not do any harm (no package name confusion with > xml.etree.elementTree and _elementtree), it is not really necessary to > force the deletion of it. > > Cheers > Marcus Yes, but why do we need to hold the ports, that nobody using and will not be anyway? All the ports I saw, that uses elementTree, first checking if they can import xml.etree and if they not, then they will try to fallback to standalone _elementtree. And since python24/25 will be removed soon, there is no sense to hold them. The only difference between them is HTMLTreeBuilder class that is missing in xml.etree (and that py-Products.TinyMCE is using), so py-elementtree should stay until Products.TinyMCE will be ported to py-lxml, and py-celementtree is safe to remove (because nobody using it). This ports/155526 should be closed too, because it's now impossible to remove this port. PS. The same belongs to simplejson/json case. Most ports try to use bundled json module first, and try to import simplejson if they fail (python<2.6). But there is couple of ports that need exactly simplejson implementation. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives. On, Thu Jun 07, 2012, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > The following reply was made to PR ports/155526; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> > To: Marcus von Appen <mva@FreeBSD.org> > Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: ports/155526: [PATCH] devel/py-elementtree: ignore if python > >= 2.5 > Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 20:13:42 +0400 > > Marcus von Appen wrote on 07.06.2012 19:39: > > As long as www/py-Products.TinyMCE depends on it, there is no way to > > delete it (without fixing www/py-Products.TinyMCE beforehand for python > >> = 2.5). > > > > Also, as it does not do any harm (no package name confusion with > > xml.etree.elementTree and _elementtree), it is not really necessary to > > force the deletion of it. > > > > Cheers > > Marcus > > Yes, but why do we need to hold the ports, that nobody using and will > not be anyway? All the ports I saw, that uses elementTree, first > checking if they can import xml.etree and if they not, then they will > try to fallback to standalone _elementtree. And since python24/25 will > be removed soon, there is no sense to hold them. Right, but there is no need to rush things, either, at least not as long as the port above has a dependency on it. > The only difference between them is HTMLTreeBuilder class that is > missing in xml.etree (and that py-Products.TinyMCE is using), so > py-elementtree should stay until Products.TinyMCE will be ported to > py-lxml, and py-celementtree is safe to remove (because nobody using > it). This ports/155526 should be closed too, because it's now impossible > to remove this port. I'd rather vote for keeping it open until www/py-Products.TinyMCE has been updated properly and lang/python24 was removed, so we do not forget about deprecating and removing devel/py-elementtree later on. Cheers Marcus Author: rm Date: Mon Sep 23 10:41:01 2013 New Revision: 327969 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/327969 Log: Remove since ElementTree is a part of standard library since Python 2.5. Last consumer of it gone today. PR: 155526 Submitted by: rm (myself) Deleted: head/devel/py-elementtree/ Modified: head/MOVED head/devel/Makefile Modified: head/MOVED ============================================================================== --- head/MOVED Mon Sep 23 10:23:35 2013 (r327968) +++ head/MOVED Mon Sep 23 10:41:01 2013 (r327969) @@ -4947,3 +4947,4 @@ devel/ptlib26|devel/ptlib|2013-09-20|Rem net/opal3|net/opal|2013-09-20|Removed old version, update to new version and moved port net/ekiga|net-im/ekiga|2013-09-20|Removed old version, update to new version and moved port net/ekiga3|net-im/ekiga|2013-09-20|Removed old version, update to new version and moved port +devel/py-elementtree||2013-09-23|ElementTree is a part of standard library since Python 2.5 Modified: head/devel/Makefile ============================================================================== --- head/devel/Makefile Mon Sep 23 10:23:35 2013 (r327968) +++ head/devel/Makefile Mon Sep 23 10:41:01 2013 (r327969) @@ -3523,7 +3523,6 @@ SUBDIR += py-durus SUBDIR += py-dynrules SUBDIR += py-eggtestinfo - SUBDIR += py-elementtree SUBDIR += py-epsilon SUBDIR += py-event SUBDIR += py-experimental.cssselect _______________________________________________ svn-ports-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-ports-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" State Changed From-To: open->closed Port removed. |
