Summary: | [PATCH] www/tomcat55: improve pidfile handling in rc script | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Phil Phillips <pphillips> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Olli Hauer <ohauer> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
Priority: | Normal | ||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Phil Phillips
2011-06-28 21:30:09 UTC
Maintainer of www/tomcat55, Please note that PR ports/158410 has just been submitted. If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch and a committer will take care of it. The full text of the PR can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158410 -- Edwin Groothuis via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool edwin@FreeBSD.org State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainers feedback (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) I've tested this patch, and it fixes a long standing issue I've wanted to fix with the startup/shutdown process for tomcat55. I approve. This PR can more than likely go with ports/158237 Thanks! -- Jason Helfman System Administrator experts-exchange.com http://www.experts-exchange.com/M_4830110.html E4AD 7CF1 1396 27F6 79DD 4342 5E92 AD66 8C8C FBA5 State Changed From-To: feedback->open Maintainer approved. Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ohauer I'll take it State Changed From-To: open->feedback Hi Phil, Jason, whath do you think if we use "! -s" instead "! -e" for the pidfile test? This way we can catch files with a zero size before using them later with KILL `cat $pidfile` That sounds like a good idea to me. Thanks! -Phil On 7/18/2011 3:29 PM, ohauer@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] www/tomcat55: improve pidfile handling in rc script > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: ohauer > State-Changed-When: Mon Jul 18 22:26:36 UTC 2011 > State-Changed-Why: > Hi Phil, Jason, > > whath do you think if we use "! -s" instead "! -e" for the pidfile test? > This way we can catch files with a zero size before using them later > with KILL `cat $pidfile` > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=158410 > ohauer 2011-07-19 22:45:27 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: www/tomcat55 Makefile www/tomcat55/files tomcat55.sh.in Removed files: www/tomcat55/files logprocessor-cronolog Log: - fix cronolog processing option [1] - improve pidfile handling in rc script [2] PR: ports/158237 [1], ports/158410 [2] Submitted by: Jason Helfman <jhelfman _at_ experts-exchange.com> (maintainer) [1] Phil Phillips <pphillips _at_ experts-exchange.com> [2] Approved by: maintainer Revision Changes Path 1.59 +7 -15 ports/www/tomcat55/Makefile 1.2 +0 -74 ports/www/tomcat55/files/logprocessor-cronolog (dead) 1.11 +8 -19 ports/www/tomcat55/files/tomcat55.sh.in _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Committed with minor changes Thanks! |