| Summary: | trimdomain does not handle peer domains | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | pirzyk <pirzyk> | ||||
| Component: | bin | Assignee: | freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | 3.4-RELEASE | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
pirzyk
2000-02-09 21:50:00 UTC
> >Number: 16619 > >Category: bin > >Synopsis: trimdomain does not handle peer domains [.....] > >Description: > > when rsh/ssh/telnet into a host in a peer domain, the hostname is > greater than UT_HOSTNAMELEN and so the IP number gets put into the > wtmp file. To releave this, we wanted the domain in common part > to be parsed out. i.e if I am on snoopy.foo.example.com and want > to login to woodstock.bar.example.com the finger info should show > on woodstock me logged in from snoopy.foo [.....] No, this is a bad idea. Last time I was in there, I actually implemented this and realised why.... $ hostname confusion.co.uk.FreeBSD.org $ slogin freefall.FreeBSD.org Freefalls logs are now garbage. This is why name resolution doesn't work this way any more either. -- Brian <brian@Awfulhak.org> <brian@FreeBSD.org> <http://www.Awfulhak.org> <brian@OpenBSD.org> Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! <brian@FreeBSD.org.uk> State Changed From-To: open->closed As Brian explained, this is a bad idea. |