| Summary: | Cannot "rm -rf" for not-existed file on read-only nfs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama> | ||||
| Component: | kern | Assignee: | freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | 4.0-CURRENT | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jun Kuriyama
2000-02-19 03:20:01 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-bugs->dillon Pass this PR to dillon. Responsible Changed From-To: dillon->freebsd-bugs Back to the free pool. > Synopsis: Cannot "rm -rf" for not-existed file on read-only nfs
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: dillon->freebsd-bugs
> Responsible-Changed-By: keramida
> Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Feb 22 18:14:28 PST 2003
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> Back to the free pool.
Look at bin/35842 with patch
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 .@babolo.ru wrote:
> > Synopsis: Cannot "rm -rf" for not-existed file on read-only nfs
> >
> > Responsible-Changed-From-To: dillon->freebsd-bugs
> > Responsible-Changed-By: keramida
> > Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Feb 22 18:14:28 PST 2003
> > Responsible-Changed-Why:
> > Back to the free pool.
> Look at bin/35842 with patch
Yes; this seems to be simpler than I first though. rm -f works so there
is no problem in the kernel.
Bruce
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 .@babolo.ru wrote:
>
> > > Synopsis: Cannot "rm -rf" for not-existed file on read-only nfs
> > >
> > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: dillon->freebsd-bugs
> > > Responsible-Changed-By: keramida
> > > Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Feb 22 18:14:28 PST 2003
> > > Responsible-Changed-Why:
> > > Back to the free pool.
> > Look at bin/35842 with patch
> Yes; this seems to be simpler than I first though. rm -f works so there
> is no problem in the kernel.
I glad to see this.
Is there chance for patch to be commited?
State Changed From-To: open->closed bin/35842 should fix this. |