|Summary:||[PATCH] devel/arduino-mk: Update to 0.10|
|Product:||Ports & Packages||Reporter:||Craig Leres <leres>|
|Component:||Individual Port(s)||Assignee:||Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco>|
|Severity:||Affects Only Me|
Description Craig Leres 2012-10-14 07:50:00 UTC
Upgrade to from 0.8 to 0.10; add OptionsNG for DOCS and EXAMPLES. Fix: Please see the attached patch. Note: files/Makefile, files/blink2.pde and files/patch-Arduino.mk are all obsolete and should be removed. Patch attached with submission follows:
Comment 1 Raphael Kubo da Costa 2012-10-21 12:11:42 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->rakuco I'll take it.
Comment 2 Raphael Kubo da Costa 2012-10-21 12:15:19 UTC
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, thanks. You might want to run portlint in your next patches, as there's some low-hanging fruit there that could be fixed.
Comment 3 Craig Leres 2012-10-21 20:58:43 UTC
Thanks! On 10/21/12 04:15, rakuco@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Committed, thanks. You might want to run portlint in your next patches, > as there's some low-hanging fruit there that could be fixed. I did run portlint and didn't see anything that can be fixed. > WARN: Makefile: possible use of absolute pathname > "/Applications/Arduin...". This path is used to patch a hardcode path in bin/ard-parse-boards; this portlint test is a bit simplistic. This could be a patch except we don't know what PREFIX will be in advance. > WARN: Makefile: only one MASTER_SITE configured. Consider adding > additional mirrors. It'd be nice if there were mirrors for this but there currently are not. > WARN: Makefile: using hyphen in PORTNAME. consider using PKGNAMEPREFIX > and/or PKGNAMESUFFIX. The package is actually named "arduino-mk" so I believe that's what PORTNAME should be set to, portlint not withstanding. > WARN: Makefile: dependency to gmake listed in RUN_DEPENDS. consider > using USE_GMAKE. This is documented in the Makefile: # gmake is needed to use the port, not to build it USE_GMAKE means "The port requires gmake to build" but not only is gmake not needed to build the port, there's nothing to build and so NO_BUILD is set. Maybe portlint should suppress this warning when NO_BUILD is present? Craig
Comment 4 Raphael Kubo da Costa 2012-10-21 22:56:15 UTC
Craig Leres <email@example.com> writes: > Thanks! > >> Committed, thanks. You might want to run portlint in your next patches, >> as there's some low-hanging fruit there that could be fixed. > > I did run portlint and didn't see anything that can be fixed. > > [...] Right, it looks like you've got it all covered :-) Sorry for the false alarm.