| Summary: | [patch] www/mod_rivet -- update to 2.1.2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Pietro Cerutti <gahr> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-apache (Nobody) <apache> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Pietro Cerutti
2013-08-20 08:20:00 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->apache apache@ wants this port PRs (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) Maintainer of www/mod_rivet,
Please note that PR ports/181421 has just been submitted.
If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix
you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch
and a committer will take care of it.
The full text of the PR can be found at:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/181421
--
Edwin Groothuis via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool
edwin@FreeBSD.org
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainers feedback (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) The upgrade to Rivet 2.1.2 was actually already completed by PR 180444 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D180444 Although the additional configuration options provided by this patch is functionality and flexibility beyond the scope of the above PR, I don't think there is sufficient demand for those non-default modes to necessitate complicating the port installation with them. Also of note, your patch enforces a USE_TCL=3D86 which is unnecessarily strict since it prevents users of Tcl 8.5, which is still a supported version. USE_TCL=3D85+ is sufficient, and is what was put in place by abov= e PR. On 2013-Aug-30, 22:18, Jeff Lawson wrote: > The upgrade to Rivet 2.1.2 was actually already completed by PR 180444 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=180444 Oh, I must have missed it. > > Although the additional configuration options provided by this patch is > functionality and flexibility beyond the scope of the above PR, I don't > think there is sufficient demand for those non-default modes to > necessitate complicating the port installation with them.a I agree that the default installation is probably enough for most users, but I also think that the two options IMP_NS and EXP_CMD are nice to have, and the complexity added to the Makefile is really negligeable. It's just a matter of two OPTIONS and two additional CONFIGURE_ARGS arguments. > Also of note, your patch enforces a USE_TCL=86 which is unnecessarily > strict since it prevents users of Tcl 8.5, which is still a supported > version. USE_TCL=85+ is sufficient, and is what was put in place by above > PR. Yes, this was probably a left-over of a previous patch. Thanks for pointing this out. I'll close this PR now and submit a new one for IMP_NS and EXP_CMD. -- Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Partly duplicate of ports/180444 |