Summary: | [patch] rm(1): Better(?) rm -If behavior (and other combination between -I, -i, and -f) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Base System | Reporter: | Edho Arief <edho> | ||||
Component: | bin | Assignee: | freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs> | ||||
Status: | Open --- | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | me | ||||
Priority: | Normal | Keywords: | patch | ||||
Version: | Unspecified | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Edho Arief
2014-03-27 04:30:00 UTC
Any way I can move this forward? Comments? Rejection? Anything? Anyone? Is there no one aliasing rm to `rm -I` and annoyed that `-f` doesn't override `-I`? For bugs matching the following conditions: - Status == In Progress - Assignee == "bugs@FreeBSD.org" - Last Modified Year <= 2017 Do - Set Status to "Open" Keyword: patch or patch-ready – in lieu of summary line prefix: [patch] * bulk change for the keyword * summary lines may be edited manually (not in bulk). Keyword descriptions and search interface: <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/describekeywords.cgi> |