| Summary: | Issue resolved should provide more states to indicate how and if an issue was resolved | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Services | Reporter: | Marcus von Appen <mva> |
| Component: | Bug Tracker | Assignee: | Bugmeister <bugmeister> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | berg2839, feld, kwm |
| Priority: | --- | ||
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Marcus von Appen
2014-06-03 19:10:36 UTC
*** Bug 190583 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** so. we won't do "Won't Fix" since the state needs to reflect the reason that it won't be fixed.
"Not Enough Information" ("No Feedback") is fine.
"Unable to Reproduce" is fine.
If these are sufficient mark this bug "loop closed"; else re-open with additional content.
Those are sufficient at the moment. Thanks! Bug 190583 is marked as a dupe of this, but the current options don't cover invalid bugs (e.g., bugs that should be reported elsewhere). reopen due to comment below Can we also have a "superseded by" state? (yes typos wheee) Duplicated comes close but not quite.. see the following bugs are example: Update link-grammer to 5.0.3 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188642 5.0.4 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188738 5.0.6 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188840 The 5.0.3 and 5.0.4 should be able to be marked superseded by the 5.0.6 update. I think "overcome by events" along with adding a "see also" is likely correct. Adding a new "enter a bug number here" resolution is actually quite difficult. I added "Report to Upstream". for additional states its likely better to open a new bug and add this one as a see also. |