Summary: | no way to disable weak ciphers in mail/imap-uw | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Leif Velcro <velcroleaf> |
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody) <ports-bugs> |
Status: | Closed Not A Bug | ||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | diizzy, thierry, velcroleaf, w.schwarzenfeld |
Priority: | --- | Keywords: | security |
Version: | Latest | ||
Hardware: | Any | ||
OS: | Any | ||
See Also: | https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195973 |
Description
Leif Velcro
2014-10-30 04:50:43 UTC
FYI, this port is unmaintained and there's no provided patch so the chances of something happening are not great unless you improve your chances (e.g. provide a tested patch) Move PR out of triage, there's no action to be done. See the discussion at <http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.uw.c-client/month=20141001>. At this point, mail/imap-uw should probably be retired and replaced by mail/panda-imap. It is based on imap-uw code and functions similarly, and is actually being maintained. Similarly, mail/cclient has been replaced by panda-cclient. Currently there is a notification that prevents you from building both at the same time (since they generate the same executables), but maybe it's time to pull the plug on imap-uw entirely. I submitted PR ports/195973 add the support of panda-cclient in lang/php5. ATM I've not yet patched panda-cclient to reduce the list of ciphers, but this is doable. That would be a very nice feature, although it is less dire now that panda-imap will compile with an openssl that has had SSLv2/SSLv3 disabled in its config. imap-uw crashes when you try to build it in that configuration, and without a means of modifying the cipher list, there was no way around the vulnerability. Actually, the part about imap-uw not building with those options might not be true. It was the case that OTHER ports didn't build (although most of these have now been cleaned up), and I think that might have been what was preventing me from using openssl in that configuration. Sorry for the confusion. All that said, imap-uw development is at the end of the road and panda-imap is being actively maintained, so the original point stands. And it's still true that a modifiable cipher list in panda-imap would be great. I think nothing will be changed with imap-uw. So I guess this could be closed. imap-uw has been unmaintained upstream for several years so I think we can close this as it's not a port(ing) issue. |