Bug 195193

Summary:

[PATCH] www/p5-FCGI upgrade to 0.77

Product:

Ports & Packages

Reporter:

geoffroy desvernay <dgeo>

Component:

Individual Port(s)

Assignee:

freebsd-perl (Nobody) <perl>

Status:

Closed FIXED

Severity:

Affects Only Me

CC:

adamw

Priority:

---

Flags:

dgeo: maintainer-feedback? (perl)

Version:

Latest

Hardware:

Any

OS:

Any

Attachments:

Description	Flags
Upgrade and workaround to use www/fcgi	none
+ corrected plist	none

Description geoffroy desvernay 2014-11-19 23:38:05 UTC

Created attachment 149613 [details]
Upgrade and workaround to use www/fcgi

Upstream upgrade to 0.77

I removed PURE_PERL option as it was removed in 0.75
http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/ETHER/FCGI-0.77/ChangeLog

also included 
CFLAGS+= -I${PREFIX}/include
to workaround a failure to build against port's libfcgi.so because ports system's invocation of Makefile.PL ends with 'INC=/usr/local/include/include' in Makefile, then cc -I/usr/local/include/include logically fails looking for fcgi_config.h.

Problem may reside in port system as it compiles OK with vanilia sources, and perl Makefile.PL --use-installed=/usr/local

HTH

Comment 1 Bugzilla Automation freebsd_committer

2014-11-19 23:38:05 UTC

Auto-assigned to maintainer perl@FreeBSD.org

Comment 2 geoffroy desvernay 2014-11-21 08:25:08 UTC

Created attachment 149662 [details]
+ corrected plist

I forgot plist change…

Comment 3 commit-hook freebsd_committer

2015-02-08 18:54:27 UTC

A commit references this bug:

Author: adamw
Date: Sun Feb  8 18:53:59 UTC 2015
New revision: 378671
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/378671

Log:
  Update to 0.77.

  PP support was dropped, so remove the PP option.

  Changes: https://metacpan.org/changes/distribution/FCGI

  PR:		195193
  Submitted by:	Geoffroy Desvernay

Changes:
  head/www/p5-FCGI/Makefile
  head/www/p5-FCGI/distinfo
  head/www/p5-FCGI/pkg-plist

Comment 4 Adam Weinberger freebsd_committer

2015-02-08 18:55:46 UTC

Hi Geoffroy, I've committed this patch. Thanks for the submission and sorry for the long delay.

I did not include your work on building this port against www/fcgi, as it builds and runs just fine on its own. If there is a reason to compile against www/fcgi instead that I am not seeing, please let me know!