Bug 198152
| Summary: | Issues with >1 cat/port (with maintainers) references in title get no Assignee, only CC's | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Services | Reporter: | Kubilay Kocak <koobs> |
| Component: | Bug Tracker | Assignee: | Bugmeister <bugmeister> |
| Status: | Open --- | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | yuri |
| Priority: | --- | Keywords: | feature, needs-qa |
| Version: | unspecified | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
| See Also: | https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198136 | ||
*** Bug 248021 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** |
If an issue summary contains multiple cat/port references (both with MAINTAINER, the current auto-assigner process results in no assignee. This is a degenerate (via ambiguity) case. For example: Title: cat1/port1: Build breaks when cat2/port2 is installed Current result after auto-assigner: Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs CC: maintainer-port1, maintainer-port2 The port then (ideally) needs to be assigned to the correct maintainer, in a separate and additional step. See bug 198136 as an example Should this be changed to: Assignee: maintainer-port1 CC: maintainer-port2 More precisely, that for: a) Issue summaries containing multiple cat/port references, b) The first referenced cat/port MAINTAINER is set as Assignee, c) IF and ONLY if the first referenced port is maintained (not ports@), AND d) All subsequent referenced cat/port maintainers are added to CC for those that are maintained (not ports@) Note: If the first references port is UNMAINTAINED, standard rules would apply (Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs) as is currently the case. If the first cat/port reference is not the port with the issue (false-positive), then it should be re-assigned. This doesn't increase workflow overhead compared to the current state.