Bug 20209

Summary: Update of FAQ to 4.1
Product: Documentation Reporter: eogren <eogren>
Component: Books & ArticlesAssignee: freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me    
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
file.diff none

Description eogren 2000-07-27 07:30:00 UTC
 The FAQ has a couple of entries about 4.0 being the latest release on
the 4-STABLE branch. Since 4.1 is hitting the FTP sites very soon (if it
hasn't already), these should probably be updated to 4.1.
 This patch also slightly rewords a couple of sentences in the big ASCII
tree in the Preface.

How-To-Repeat: 
n/a
Comment 1 ue 2000-07-27 19:18:39 UTC
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 02:24:25AM -0400, eogren@earthlink.net wrote:
Some comments:

> Index: book.sgml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/local/doctree/doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml,v
> retrieving revision 1.80
> diff -u -r1.80 book.sgml
> --- book.sgml	2000/07/25 18:24:48	1.80
> +++ book.sgml	2000/07/27 06:19:25
> @@ -154,9 +154,9 @@
> -	    URL="ftp://[...]/releases/i386/4.0-RELEASE/">4.0</ulink>
> +	    URL="ftp://[...]/releases/i386/4.1-RELEASE/">4.0</ulink>
                                           ^^^           ^^^
You may want to use 1,$s/4\.0/4.1/g next time ;-)

> @@ -300,23 +300,26 @@
>                 3.0-RELEASE (Oct 1998)
>                    |
>                    |  [3.0-STABLE]
> - *BRANCH*      3.1-RELESE  (Feb 1999) -&gt; 3.2 -&gt; 3.3 -&gt; 3.4 -&gt; ... future 3.x releases ...
> + *BRANCH*      3.1-RELEASE  (Feb 1999) -&gt; 3.2 -&gt; 3.3 -&gt; 3.4 -&gt; ... future 3.x releases ...
>                    |                     (May 1999) (Sep 1999) (Dec 1999)
You may want to add 3.5-RELEASE (June 2000)

> -	    with the release of 2.2.8.  3.4-STABLE has now replaced it,
> +	    with the release of 2.2.8.  3-STABLE replaced it,
>  	    with 3.4-RELEASE being released in mid-December 1999.
"with 3.5-RELEASE having been released in June 2000"

> @@ -408,9 +411,9 @@
> -	      <para>The current 4.X-STABLE release, 4.0-RELEASE can be
> +	      <para>The current 4.X-STABLE release, 4.1-RELEASE can be
I would prefer to use 4-STABLE instead of 4.X-STABLE. There's only one
CVS Branch for the variouses 4.X-Releases.

>  	      found in the <ulink
> -	      URL="ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.0-RELEASE/"> the 4.0-RELEASE</ulink> directory.</para>
> +	      URL="ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.1-RELEASE/"> the 4.1-RELEASE</ulink> directory.</para>
will result in "... found in the <the 4.1-RELEASE> directory." (link part
denoted by <>)

One of the two "the" can be removed and the word directory should be a part
of the link, too. In other words, use 

found in <ulink URL="ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.1-RELEASE/"the 4.1-RELEASE directory</ulink>.</para>

and get 
"...found in <the 4.1-RELEASE directory>"

> @@ -3877,7 +3880,7 @@
>  </listitem>
>  </varlistentry>
>  
> -<varlistentry><term>for 4.0-RELEASE/4.X-STABLE</term>
> +<varlistentry><term>for 4.1-RELEASE/4.X-STABLE</term>
Again, I'd prefer to use 4-STABLE instead of 4.X-STABLE.

/s/Udo
-- 
"I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit - it's the only way
to be sure." (Aliens II)
Comment 2 Jim Mock freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2000-08-04 21:57:35 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed, thanks!