| Summary: | cannot safely remove COMPAT_43 from the kernel config | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | Darern Reed <darrenr> |
| Component: | kern | Assignee: | Andre Oppermann <andre> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | 5.0-CURRENT | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Darern Reed
2000-08-13 09:10:00 UTC
State Changed From-To: open->closed That's why the option is marked with "[KEEP THIS!]" in GENERIC and "You probably do NOT want to remove this as much current code still relies on the 4.3 emulation." in NOTES. State Changed From-To: closed->open This was prematurely closed by the person answering it as the problem has not been fixed. If "COMPAT_43" is not optional then it needs to no longer be an option. If it is to remain an option then compile problems which occur when it is excluded need to be fixed. Until one of these two routes is taken, this PR should remain open. On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 21:56:51 +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
> I think the email from Mike (just recently) explained the situation - there
> has been a "problem" created by changes to the signal code.
If that's all that's standing in the way of COMPAT_43 becoming
optional, then you should assign the PR to marcel, who'll probably have
it sorted out in short order.
I must admit, my impression was that this would take a lot of work to
fix and that it wasn't a simple case of correcting one area of the
kernel.
Ciao,
Sheldon.
Since the message I replied to wasn't the one attached to this PR, I'll briefly re-state my point, so that it makes it into the PR history: It used to be possible to compile and run a kernel without having COMPAT_43 defined. The last major signal change broke this. Someone was supposed to be working on resolving this, but I think it fell through the cracks, since it has been quite a while since that signal change. I can try and dig up more info if anyone wants (I may still have some of the e-mail archived). -Mike On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 09:56:51PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote: > I think the email from Mike (just recently) explained the situation - there > has been a "problem" created by changes to the signal code. > > In some email I received from Sheldon Hearn, sie wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 04:01:00 MST, darrenr@FreeBSD.ORG wrote: > > > > > Until one of these two routes is taken, this PR should remain open. > > > > Darren, please decide which of the 3 options I outlined works best for > > you. > > > > Ciao, > > Sheldon. -- Mike Pritchard mpp@FreeBSD.org or mpp@mppsystems.com Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-bugs->marcel Marcel, could you take a look at this, now that you're "back on board". ? :-) State Changed From-To: open->closed This PR is idle for too long. I can compile 5.2RC2-i386 without COMPAT_43 in the kernel config. Responsible Changed From-To: marcel->andre This PR is idle for too long. I can compile 5.2RC2-i386 without COMPAT_43 in the kernel config. |