Summary: | net-mgmt/pandorafms_*: Update to 6.0SP1 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | KIKUCHI Koichiro <oi4io5me.cesium3> | ||||||||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Jason Unovitch <junovitch> | ||||||||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||||||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | junovitch | ||||||||||
Priority: | --- | Keywords: | patch, patch-ready | ||||||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||||||||
URL: | http://blog.pandorafms.org/pandora-fms-6-0-sp1-is-out | ||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
KIKUCHI Koichiro
2016-01-29 09:31:16 UTC
Created attachment 166266 [details]
poudriere testport log (net-mgmt/pandorafms_agent)
Created attachment 166267 [details]
poudriere testport log (net-mgmt/pandorafms_console)
Created attachment 166268 [details]
poudriere testport log (net-mgmt/pandorafms_server)
A commit references this bug: Author: junovitch Date: Sun Feb 14 15:40:47 UTC 2016 New revision: 408864 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/408864 Log: net-mgmt/pandorafms_{agent,console,server}: update 6.0 -> 6.0SP1 - Update shared PANDORA_VERSION to 6.0SP1 and bump PORTREVISION - Include newsyslog.conf.d log rotation file PR: 206734 Submitted by: KIKUCHI Koichiro <oi4io5me.cesium3@gmail.com> (maintainer) Changes: head/net-mgmt/pandorafms_agent/distinfo head/net-mgmt/pandorafms_console/Makefile head/net-mgmt/pandorafms_console/distinfo head/net-mgmt/pandorafms_console/files/newsyslog.conf.in head/net-mgmt/pandorafms_console/files/patch-index.php head/net-mgmt/pandorafms_console/pkg-plist head/net-mgmt/pandorafms_server/bsd.pandora.mk head/net-mgmt/pandorafms_server/distinfo head/net-mgmt/pandorafms_server/pkg-plist The SP1 was trimmed from the original PORTVERSION so end users would have no way to get the updated package. I bumped PORTREVISION in the shared .mk file to go with this update. Also, I credited the email the PR was submitted with but notice the MAINTAINER is another email address. Is that still valid? (In reply to Jason Unovitch from comment #5) MAINTAINER address (koichiro@rworks.jp) is still valid. I didn't grasp until recently that maintainer need to use MAINTAINER mail address as Bugzilla account and MAINTAINER account is already exist :( I'll switch to MAINTAINER account after this post, thanks. (In reply to KIKUCHI Koichiro from comment #6) It's not a requirement. I just noticed the email the PR used didn't match the port. If the email is still a valid email for you then that is fine. |