| Summary: | mail/opensmtpd: Add libressl support, base openssl default | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Andrey Fesenko <andrey> | ||||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Ashish SHUKLA <ashish> | ||||||||
| Status: | Closed Not Accepted | ||||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | andrey, ashish, brnrd | ||||||||
| Priority: | --- | Keywords: | feature, needs-qa, patch | ||||||||
| Version: | Latest | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(ashish) |
||||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Andrey Fesenko
2016-02-07 00:56:58 UTC
Created attachment 166684 [details]
poudriere bulk -t log curent
Created attachment 166685 [details]
poudriere bulk -t log 9.3
The ports framework already provides a user-configurable option to switch OPENSSL_PORT and there have been numerous other proposals in the past to add LIBRESSL/OPENSSL as port OPTIONS in the the past for individual ports, which have been deferred/denied on the basis that its desirable: * For the ports framework to provide these OPTIONS consistently in every port that offers SSL functionality, instead of on a port by port basis, given that LIBRESSL/OPENSSL are drop-in replacements of each others. * To ensure that any port that offers these ports as options, does so in a consistent manner, with regard to option naming, and behaviour. CC'ing Bernard, who recently proposed a change to add something similar in another port. OpenSSL and LibreSSL can not co-exist. The option must be global as it currently is using WITH_OPENSSL_PORT= yes and WITH_OPENSSL= security/(openssl|libressl|libressl-devel) The only reason to have a hard dependency on LibreSSL is if the port requires libtls which does not exist in OpenSSL (e.g. www/obhttpd) Setting WITH_OPENSSL_PORT requires a rebuild of all ports in use or suffer from cascaded dependency fails. Rejecting in favour of bug #206523 |