|Summary:||devel/efl still should not require OpenSSL from ports, GnuTLS should be an option|
|Product:||Ports & Packages||Reporter:||Mikhail T. <mi>|
|Component:||Individual Port(s)||Assignee:||freebsd-enlightenment mailing list <enlightenment>|
|Severity:||Affects Only Me||CC:||christopherpetrik335, gblach, w.schwarzenfeld|
Description Mikhail T. 2016-03-16 23:19:55 UTC
Created attachment 168309 [details] Do not require OpenSSL from port, allow use of GnuTLS The problem once solved under Bug #195532 reared its head again with the recent upgrade of the port. The proposed patch once again removes the gratuitous requirement, while also adding the GNUTLS option.
Comment 1 Grzegorz Blach 2016-03-17 15:42:40 UTC
On older FreeBSD releases (but still supported) base OpenSSL is too old to work with EFL, in this case WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes is required. OPTIONS_RADIO allows to not select any choice, so NOSSL is redundant. Also case without any selected choice isn't handled by your patch.
Comment 2 Walter Schwarzenfeld 2018-01-13 06:16:58 UTC
Is it solved or overcome by events?
Comment 3 Chris Petrik 2018-03-13 23:27:30 UTC
I don't see where enlightenment actively requires OpenSSL from ports? Will Uses SSL not detect base/ports ?
Comment 4 Chris Petrik 2018-03-13 23:29:55 UTC
The patch for gnutls should be communicated with the head dev, so we don't have lame patches such as patch-gnutls with 4 lines :).