| Summary: | Stop using sbrk(2) in devel/binutils | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Andrew Turner <Andrew> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Andrew Turner <Andrew> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | Andrew, portmgr | ||||
| Priority: | --- | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(bapt) Andrew: exp-run? |
||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Bug Depends on: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 207867 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
Hi, What kind of failure do you expect? I don't expect any failures, but Baptiste asked for an exp run when I talked to him about it at AsiaBSDCon. Exp-run didn't show any new failure (i386 and amd64). A commit references this bug: Author: andrew Date: Tue Mar 29 14:09:48 UTC 2016 New revision: 412112 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/412112 Log: Stop calling sbrk from binutils. This will help remive the need for this function on arm64. PR: 208255 Approved by: bapt Sponsored by: ABT Systems Ltd Changes: head/devel/binutils/Makefile |
Created attachment 168557 [details] Patch to stop using sbrk in devel/binutils We are planning on removing sbrk from arm64. Before we can do this we need to stop calling it from binutils so ld doesn't break. The attached patch forces configure to assume it doesn't exist.