| Summary: | 11.0-CURRENT -r298793 automatic shutdown for "kernel: ACPI Error: No installed handler for fixed event - PM_Timer (0), disabling (20160422/evevent-323)" and more under virtual box | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd> |
| Component: | bin | Assignee: | freebsd-acpi (Nobody) <acpi> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | jhb, jkim |
| Priority: | --- | Keywords: | patch |
| Version: | CURRENT | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Mark Millard
2016-05-03 06:01:17 UTC
(In reply to Mark Millard from comment #0) I duplicated the directory tree that held the virtual machine on Mac OS X before booting to install the kernel and world. This was running -r297769. When I boot the -r297769 virtual machine instead of the -r298793 one the problem does not occur. Both -r297769 and -r298793 11.0-'s have /usr/ports -r414369 and the ports were built before the -r298793 buildworld/buildkernel was done. And both -r297769 and -r298793 11.0's are running under the same vintage of Virtual Box (5.0.20 r106931). So what is different is just the FreeBSD vintage. 11.0's -r297769 virtual machine does contain the buildworld/buildkernel /usr/obj material for -r298793, it is just not installed. A list reply by Guillermo Garc?a Rojas reports: I'm having the same issue with downloaded ISO from Monday May 2nd under VirtualBox same version. It happens at 10 minutes after system is started. So it is not just me that sees the issue. In the lists John Baldwin reports: This was already covered in an earlier thread. r298838 has the fix / workaround. -- John Baldwin So I've updated /usr/src to -r298990 and am rebuilding. It will be a while before I can confirm/deny the status of the result for my context. (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #3) In reply to John B. Jung-uk Kim wrote that there now is an upstream patch available: FYI, the upstream was notified and a patch is available from here: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/138 Jung-uk Kim So maybe this bug (209222) should stick around to be tied to having the upstream fix in place, not just a work around. 11.0-CURRENT -r298990 has proven to no have this problem: so the work-around seems to be working. But so far as I know the upstream change for an actual fix is still not applied. (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #5) As of 11.0 -r301815 the problem is still gone. I do not know if the upstream patch was ever applied but if not it may be that the work around is the final 11.0 code for the issue. This leaves me unclear on if this should be closed as fixed for 11.0 or left open to indicate that the upstream patch should still be considered someday in 11.0-STABLE (and 11.x for 0<x) once 11.0-STABLE exists. I think this is fine to be closed. |