Summary: | security/clamav: Update to 0.99.2 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Leonid Nevecherya <nevecherya> | ||||||||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Xin LI <delphij> | ||||||||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||||||
Severity: | Affects Many People | CC: | admin, delphij, garga, junovitch, nevecherya, ports-secteam | ||||||||||
Priority: | --- | Flags: | bugzilla:
maintainer-feedback?
(garga) |
||||||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||||||||
URL: | http://blog.clamav.net/2016/05/clamav-0992-has-been-released.html | ||||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Leonid Nevecherya
2016-05-08 20:39:23 UTC
Created attachment 170293 [details] Update_to_0.99.2 Changes: http://blog.clamav.net/2016/05/clamav-0992-has-been-released.html * 7z: fix for FolderStartPackStreamIndex array index heck * try to minimize the err cleanup path * clamunrar: notice if unpacking comment failed * libclamav: print raw certificate metadata * adding libfreshclam * Add 'cdb' datafile to sigtools list of datafile types. * filetype consistency * add other... Created attachment 170310 [details]
The patch was mangled, regenerated and verified with GPG
Please also merge to quarterly branch.
Created attachment 170764 [details] Fix patch Fix patch, because: # make ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for clamav-0.99 ===> clamav-0.99.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by clamav-0.99.2 for building ===> Extracting for clamav-0.99.2 => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for clamav-0.99.2.tar.gz. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: clamav-0.99.2.tar.gz ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for clamav-0.99 ===> clamav-0.99.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => clamav-0.99.2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://www.clamav.net/downloads/production/clamav-0.99.2.tar.gz clamav-0.99.2.tar.gz 100% of 15 MB 472 kBps 00m33s ===> Fetching all distfiles required by clamav-0.99.2 for building ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for clamav-0.99 ===> clamav-0.99.2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by clamav-0.99.2 for building => SHA256 Checksum mismatch for clamav-0.99.2.tar.gz. ===> Giving up on fetching files: clamav-0.99.2.tar.gz Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/security/clamav/distinfo) are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". *** Error code 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/clamav *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/clamav *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/security/clamav To Xin LI & Vladimir Omelchuk Remove +TIMESTAMP = 146.... from your patches. People don't need know your local timestamp of clamav-0.99.2.tar.gz Created attachment 170778 [details] Fix patch (In reply to Leonid Nevecherya from comment #4) Done. A commit references this bug: Author: delphij Date: Sun May 29 22:08:05 UTC 2016 New revision: 416126 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416126 Log: Update to 0.99.2. PR: ports/209384 Submitted by: Leonid Nevecherya <nevecherya gmail com> Approved by: maintainer timeout MFH: 2016Q2 Changes: head/security/clamav/Makefile head/security/clamav/distinfo A commit references this bug: Author: delphij Date: Sun May 29 22:08:47 UTC 2016 New revision: 416128 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416128 Log: MFH: r416126 Update to 0.99.2. PR: ports/209384 Submitted by: Leonid Nevecherya <nevecherya gmail com> Approved by: ports-secteam Changes: _U branches/2016Q2/ branches/2016Q2/security/clamav/Makefile branches/2016Q2/security/clamav/distinfo Committed, thanks! (In reply to Leonid Nevecherya from comment #4) This is incorrect. The TIMESTAMPS are there for the build system to set to enable reproducible builds. They should be left in place on future updates. (In reply to Jason Unovitch from comment #9) Ah good to know. Thanks for pointing it out. I think we should do it the next time the port is updated then. Is the design discussed somewhere? (can't find some in-depth discussion or design docs, and I'm inclined to agree with Bryan's comments in the review). (In reply to Xin LI from comment #10) It's relatively new. There's more info in the commit message at https://svnweb.FreeBSD.org/changeset/ports/415078 and review at https://reviews.FreeBSD.org/D6031. I don't recall see any formal announcements of the efforts however. Ok. I understood my mistake. :) |