Bug 210042

Summary: databases/mysql57-server, databases/mysql57-client: Update to 5.7.13
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: Kurt Jaeger <pi>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: Kurt Jaeger <pi>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me CC: mmokhi, pi
Priority: --- Keywords: easy, patch, patch-ready
Version: LatestFlags: mmokhi: maintainer-feedback+
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Description Flags
patch for updating mysql57 port mmokhi: maintainer-approval+

Description Kurt Jaeger freebsd_committer 2016-06-05 03:14:43 UTC
Created attachment 171033 [details]

testbuilds, portlint look fine
Comment 1 Kurt Jaeger freebsd_committer 2016-06-05 03:15:21 UTC
Created attachment 171034 [details]
Comment 2 VK freebsd_triage 2016-06-05 11:10:20 UTC
Making summary searchable by individual port names.
Comment 3 Mahdi Mokhtari freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2016-06-07 12:22:39 UTC
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #0 and #1)
Seems okay for me :)
But a point that i guess should be changed is omitting PORTREVISION?=0
Comment 4 Mahdi Mokhtari freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2016-06-07 13:29:14 UTC
Created attachment 171142 [details]
patch for updating mysql57 port

This patch does exactly like Kurt's patch but not using PORTREVISION?=0
Comment 5 Mahdi Mokhtari freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2016-06-08 09:58:52 UTC
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger)
Will you commit it yourself ? [assuming you're a port-committer :D]
Comment 6 commit-hook freebsd_committer 2016-06-15 05:41:15 UTC
A commit references this bug:

Author: pi
Date: Wed Jun 15 05:40:38 UTC 2016
New revision: 416915
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416915

  databases/mysql57-{server|client}: 5.7.12 -> 5.7.13


  PR:		210042
  Approved by:	Mahdi Mokhtari <mokhi64@gmail.com> (maintainer)

Comment 7 Kurt Jaeger freebsd_committer 2016-06-15 06:33:24 UTC
The PORTREVISION? are placeholders and do not change the version string if =0.

So I kept them in there.
Comment 8 Mahdi Mokhtari freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2016-06-15 11:06:17 UTC
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #7)
> So I kept them in there.
Okay, Thanks for explanation ;) 
Before now, i always deleted PORTREVISION in every upgrade of ports (because there's no diff to keep it or delete it)

BTW, i see no problem to keep them too ;)