Bug 210042
| Summary: | databases/mysql57-server, databases/mysql57-client: Update to 5.7.13 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Kurt Jaeger <pi> | ||||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Kurt Jaeger <pi> | ||||||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | mmokhi, pi | ||||||||
| Priority: | --- | Keywords: | easy, patch, patch-ready | ||||||||
| Version: | Latest | Flags: | mmokhi:
maintainer-feedback+
|
||||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
Created attachment 171034 [details]
patch-client
Making summary searchable by individual port names. (In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #0 and #1) Seems okay for me :) But a point that i guess should be changed is omitting PORTREVISION?=0 Created attachment 171142 [details]
patch for updating mysql57 port
This patch does exactly like Kurt's patch but not using PORTREVISION?=0
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger) Will you commit it yourself ? [assuming you're a port-committer :D] A commit references this bug: Author: pi Date: Wed Jun 15 05:40:38 UTC 2016 New revision: 416915 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416915 Log: databases/mysql57-{server|client}: 5.7.12 -> 5.7.13 Changes: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/relnotes/mysql/5.7/en/news-5-7-13.html PR: 210042 Approved by: Mahdi Mokhtari <mokhi64@gmail.com> (maintainer) Changes: head/databases/mysql57-client/Makefile head/databases/mysql57-server/Makefile head/databases/mysql57-server/distinfo The PORTREVISION? are placeholders and do not change the version string if =0. So I kept them in there. (In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #7) > So I kept them in there. Okay, Thanks for explanation ;) Before now, i always deleted PORTREVISION in every upgrade of ports (because there's no diff to keep it or delete it) BTW, i see no problem to keep them too ;) |
Created attachment 171033 [details] patch-server testbuilds, portlint look fine