Bug 212659
| Summary: | Reassign security/obfsclient to ports@ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Fabian Keil <fk> |
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | amdmi3 |
| Priority: | --- | Flags: | fk:
maintainer-feedback+
|
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Fabian Keil
2016-09-13 15:49:14 UTC
Could you please elaborate on what's the problem? What's undocumented? This has been discussed several times in the past already so I don't see the point of discussing it again. The discussion is archived, though, so if you're interested to read up on it you could start with: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187926 and the archive of freebsd-ports@. Is rolling back to installing license as docfile an option? I'm not sure if the other committers will/would tolerate such a rollback, but it sounds good to me. I don't mind the other changes from r421831. A commit references this bug: Author: amdmi3 Date: Wed Oct 5 20:17:05 UTC 2016 New revision: 423386 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/423386 Log: - Bring back license installation - Add missing USES=ssl PR: 212659 Submitted by: fk@fabiankeil.de (maintainer) Changes: head/security/obfsclient/Makefile Looks like I misunderstood what you meant by "rolling back". As the undocumented LICENSE claims persist I don't want to be responsible for the port anymore. A commit references this bug: Author: amdmi3 Date: Fri Nov 4 13:40:18 UTC 2016 New revision: 425323 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/425323 Log: - Reset maintainer by his own request PR: 212659 Submitted by: fk@fabiankeil.de (maintainer) Changes: head/security/obfsclient/Makefile |
