|Summary:||[NEW PORT] devel/listserialc: Multiplatform program to list serial ports|
|Product:||Ports & Packages||Reporter:||Kyle Evans <kevans>|
|Component:||Individual Port(s)||Assignee:||Boris Samorodov <bsam>|
|Severity:||Affects Only Me||CC:||bsam|
|Bug Depends on:||213053|
Description Kyle Evans 2016-10-11 19:34:12 UTC
Created attachment 175635 [details] shar(1) archive of devel/listserialc Provides lib/jni/liblistSerialsj.so and bin/listSerialC, the former of which is required for Arduino 1.6. This is generally a simple/small wrapper around devel/libserialport, thus inheriting the license from it. Tested using Poudriere, builds on my -CURRENT machine, and portlint seems to be happy.
Comment 1 Boris Samorodov 2016-10-11 20:06:29 UTC
Comment 2 commit-hook 2016-10-11 22:04:24 UTC
A commit references this bug: Author: bsam Date: Tue Oct 11 22:03:27 UTC 2016 New revision: 423803 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/423803 Log: Simple multi-platform program to list serial ports with vid/pid/iserial fields. WWW: https://github.com/arduino/listSerialPortsC PR: 213391 Submitted by: firstname.lastname@example.org Changes: head/devel/Makefile head/devel/listserialc/ head/devel/listserialc/Makefile head/devel/listserialc/distinfo head/devel/listserialc/pkg-descr
Comment 3 Boris Samorodov 2016-10-11 22:08:57 UTC
Committed, thanks! A note: seems that some ports (i.e. my new devel/libserialport) along with this one most fit comms CATEGORY. What do you think?
Comment 4 Kyle Evans 2016-10-11 22:35:31 UTC
(In reply to Boris Samorodov from comment #3) I would be inclined to agree, personally. I offered devel/listserialc based solely on the fact that libserialport was already in devel/ and this is just a light wrapper around it. comms/ would seem to be a much better fit for both of them.
Comment 5 Boris Samorodov 2016-10-11 22:54:16 UTC
OK. Then let's do the hard part (arduino-1.6 port) and then do shuffling and refinements.
Comment 6 Kyle Evans 2016-10-11 23:01:48 UTC
Roger. Here in a bit I'll be submitting devel/arduino-ctags (ctags-5.8 + arduino patches)- would it be acceptable to just throw the ctags binary it produces @ $PREFIX/arduino/tools-builder/ctags-5.8/ctags?