Summary: | devel/linux-kernel: Update to 4.9 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Tobias Kortkamp <tobik> | ||||||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3> | ||||||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | Keywords: | patch | ||||||||
Priority: | --- | ||||||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||||||
URL: | https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.8.11 | ||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Tobias Kortkamp
2016-11-26 14:31:47 UTC
- Please submit as proper SVN patch - Please exclude useless patch date bumps from the patch Created attachment 177769 [details]
linux-kernel.diff
Here is an SVN patch without the date bumps.
What's wrong with git generated patches? I've submitted git-generated
patches before and nobody has complained so far.
Created attachment 177912 [details] linux-kernel.diff Update to Linux 4.9 Synth test log: https://pkg.tobik.me/logs/devel___linux-kernel.log > What's wrong with git generated patches? I've submitted git-generated
patches before and nobody has complained so far.
Because we use SVN and tools we use get confused by non-native patches.
A commit references this bug: Author: amdmi3 Date: Sun Dec 25 13:09:47 UTC 2016 New revision: 429415 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/429415 Log: - Update to 4.9 PR: 214851 Submitted by: t@tobik.me (maintainer) Changes: head/devel/linux-kernel/Makefile head/devel/linux-kernel/distinfo head/devel/linux-kernel/files/patch-Documentation_DocBook_media_Makefile head/devel/linux-kernel/files/patch-Makefile |