Summary: | [Update]lang/python27:Update to 2.7.13 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Wen Heping <wen> | ||||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Wen Heping <wen> | ||||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | portmgr, python | ||||||
Priority: | --- | ||||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Call for test. Shall I require exp-run for this update ? wen (In reply to Wen Heping from comment #1) Yes, there should be an exp-run. lang/python-doc* is broken for instance. Created attachment 178191 [details]
Update python27 and python-doc-* to 2.7.13
Ask for Exp-run Exp-run looks fine. A commit references this bug: Author: wen Date: Mon Dec 26 01:01:04 UTC 2016 New revision: 429470 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/429470 Log: - Update to 2.7.13 PR: 215375 Submitted by: wen@ Exp-run by: antoine@ Changes: head/lang/python-doc-html/distinfo head/lang/python27/Makefile.version head/lang/python27/distinfo head/lang/python27/files/patch-Include__pyport.h head/lang/python27/files/patch-Lib__distutils__unixccompiler.py head/lang/python27/files/patch-Modules___ssl.c head/lang/python27/pkg-plist |
Created attachment 178047 [details] Update to 2.7.13 Update to 2.7.13