| Summary: | [PATCH] Add -r option to /usr/bin/mail, quiet compiler warnings | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Base System | Reporter: | DougB <DougB> | ||||
| Component: | bin | Assignee: | Doug Barton <dougb> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | 3.5.1-STABLE | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
DougB
2000-09-26 23:10:01 UTC
>>>>> "DougB" == DougB <DougB@gorean.org> writes:
DougB> The solaris version of the -r command actually sets
DougB> the "From:" header, but that is very un-BSD-like. This
DougB> seems to be an acceptable and useful alternative.
Setting reply-to: instead of changing from: breaks group reply semantics.
If you want to change from:, change from:. mail(1) already gives you a
way to insert a reply-to: header if that's what you really need. (See
the drums mailing list archives for months of agonizing discussion on
this very topic.)
Why is changing from: un-BSD like? The behaviour is sanctioned by RFC822,
and many MUAs allow it.
--lyndon
State Changed From-To: open->feedback The only response I've had so far has been mildly negative. I plan to solicit more commentary when I have time to revisit this. Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-bugs->dougb Take charge of my own PR State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Close a prehistoric PR that I opened before I became a committer, which is no longer relevant. |