Bug 215761

Summary: refactor do-patch
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: Mathieu Arnold <mat>
Component: Ports FrameworkAssignee: Mathieu Arnold <mat>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me CC: adamw, portmgr, ports-bugs
Priority: --- Flags: mat: exp-run?
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
URL: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9029
Bug Depends on:    
Bug Blocks: 215726    
Attachments:
Description Flags
v1
none
v2
none
v3
none
v4 none

Description Mathieu Arnold freebsd_committer 2017-01-04 11:39:45 UTC
Created attachment 178501 [details]
v1

I tested all the edge cases I could think of, and find, I don't expect much failures.
Comment 1 Antoine Brodin freebsd_committer 2017-01-09 12:36:00 UTC
There is a problem with the handling of strip flags

emulators/xen-kernel and sysutils/xen-tools fail to patch for instance.
Comment 2 Mathieu Arnold freebsd_committer 2017-01-09 14:14:56 UTC
there must have been a bug in the old code, with some variables being left over from the previous patch, fixing these two.
Comment 3 Mathieu Arnold freebsd_committer 2017-01-09 15:04:36 UTC
Yeah, the strip instruction was not wiped between patches, so the -p of one watch would be applied to the next if it did not have one.
Comment 4 Mathieu Arnold freebsd_committer 2017-01-10 12:07:16 UTC
Created attachment 178702 [details]
v2
Comment 6 Mathieu Arnold freebsd_committer 2017-01-11 14:22:50 UTC
Created attachment 178747 [details]
v3

Spaces in a WRKSRC directory where not an edge case I found, fixed. (along with a couple of other issues)
Comment 7 Antoine Brodin freebsd_committer 2017-01-11 14:37:30 UTC
There are some ports that use or set PATCH_ARGS and PATCH_DIST_ARGS directly
Comment 8 Mathieu Arnold freebsd_committer 2017-01-11 14:41:30 UTC
Ah, yes, I had it on my todo list and forgot about those.
Comment 9 Adam Weinberger freebsd_committer 2017-01-11 14:44:00 UTC
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #7)

Is it worth also checking for Makefile.local in the external tree? It makes sense to want those in VCS too and it'd allow for altering PATCH_ARGS at the same time.
Comment 10 Mathieu Arnold freebsd_committer 2017-01-11 15:00:14 UTC
Created attachment 178749 [details]
v4
Comment 11 Mathieu Arnold freebsd_committer 2017-01-11 15:02:30 UTC
I don't think it is, and in any way, it would be a different changeset.
Comment 12 Mathieu Arnold freebsd_committer 2017-01-11 15:05:26 UTC
Also, I don't remember anyone asking for that.
In a general case, we try to not add functionalities nobody asks or want, because once we have them, we have to maintain them :-)
Comment 13 Antoine Brodin freebsd_committer 2017-01-14 19:49:47 UTC
Exp-run looks fine.
Comment 14 commit-hook freebsd_committer 2017-01-16 16:48:16 UTC
A commit references this bug:

Author: mat
Date: Mon Jan 16 16:47:02 UTC 2017
New revision: 431680
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/431680

Log:
  Extract do-patch into a separate script.

  PR:		215761
  Submitted by:	mat
  Exp-run by:	antoine
  Sponsored by:	Absolight
  Differential Revision:	https://reviews.freebsd.org/D9029

Changes:
  head/CHANGES
  head/Mk/Scripts/do-patch.sh
  head/Mk/bsd.port.mk
  head/chinese/mutt/Makefile
  head/devel/gdb/Makefile
  head/games/cake/Makefile
  head/graphics/xv/Makefile
  head/japanese/mutt-devel/Makefile
  head/lang/smlnj/Makefile
  head/mail/mutt/Makefile
  head/mail/mutt14/Makefile
  head/russian/napster/Makefile
  head/sysutils/pftop/Makefile
  head/textproc/miller/Makefile
  head/www/publicfile/Makefile
  head/x11/rxvt-unicode/Makefile