Bug 215795
| Summary: | archivers/lua51-zlib update 1.0 to 1.1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Sir l33tname <sirl33tname> | ||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Mark Felder <feld> | ||||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | feld | ||||||
| Priority: | --- | Flags: | sirl33tname:
maintainer-feedback?
(feld) |
||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
Created attachment 178542 [details]
archivers/lua51-zlib update 1.0 to 1.1 + CONFLICTS_INSTALL
I'm not sure if this is really needed since I wasn't able to install the archivers/lua-lzlib port with lua51. But if I understand it correctly it would be somehow possible and then these ports are conflicting since they both install
/lib/lua/{VER}/zlib.so.
If I'm right with my assumptions please merge this one if not use the first patch.
by setting your default lua version, you could create this conflict if you were building your packages manually. I can see a scenario where you have multiple verions of lua installed and this lua51-zlib would then not conflict with the other lua-lzlib package... as a result I'm going to leave out the CONFLICTS for now because creating the conflict is tricky enough and pkg will notice and throw an error. A commit references this bug: Author: feld Date: Mon Jan 9 18:30:22 UTC 2017 New revision: 430999 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/430999 Log: archivers/lua51-zlib: Update to 1.1 PR: 215795 Changes: head/archivers/lua51-zlib/Makefile head/archivers/lua51-zlib/distinfo |
Created attachment 178541 [details] archivers/lua51-zlib update 1.0 to 1.1 Just a small update from 1.0 to 1.1.