Summary: | security/sssd: upstream has moved from fedorahosted to pagure.io | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Alan Somers <asomers> | ||||||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody) <ports-bugs> | ||||||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||||
Severity: | Affects Some People | CC: | asomers, lukas.slebodnik | ||||||||
Priority: | --- | Flags: | lukas.slebodnik:
maintainer-feedback+
|
||||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Alan Somers
![]() ![]() Created attachment 181157 [details]
Update MASTER_SITES
Created attachment 181168 [details]
Update WWW too
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=181168 does not look good to me. May I know why https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=181157 was marked as obsolete? Created attachment 181170 [details]
Fix WWW and MASTER_SITES for the right port
Shoot. I marked the first patch as obsolete because it didn't update WWW. But I accidentally uploaded the diff for the wrong pr.
(In reply to Alan Somers from comment #4) >Created attachment 181170 [details] >Fix WWW and MASTER_SITES for the right port > Looks good to me. >Shoot. I marked the first patch as obsolete because it didn't update WWW. But >I accidentally uploaded the diff for the wrong pr. So could you mark "Update WWW too" as obsolete then? A commit references this bug: Author: asomers Date: Mon Mar 27 20:48:28 UTC 2017 New revision: 437085 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/437085 Log: security/sssd: upstream has moved from fedorahosted to pagure.io PR: 218082 Reviewed by: lukas.slebodnik@intrak.sk (maintainer) Approved by: brd (ports) Changes: head/security/sssd/Makefile head/security/sssd/pkg-descr Patch was pushed. So could you close the bug? |