Bug 219748
| Summary: | multimedia/zoneminder: Update to 1.30.4 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Ivan <bsd> | ||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3> | ||||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | bsd | ||||||
| Priority: | --- | Keywords: | needs-qa, patch | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | Flags: | bsd:
maintainer-feedback+
amdmi3: merge-quarterly- |
||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
Clean summary. maintainer-feedback (+) is only required if requested (?). @Ivan Can you confirm this change passes QA? (poudriere in particular) Created attachment 183178 [details]
QA
QA attached. For the future: should I always attach poudriere logs or QA passed statement should be enough?
@Ivan QA confirmation is sufficient unless logs are specifically requested (usually for additional information to isolate/debug), but its good to know details (like below) without being overly verbose: portlint: OK (looks fine.) testport: OK (poudriere, <versions>, <archs>, <OPTIONS> tested) whatever: OK A commit references this bug: Author: amdmi3 Date: Mon Jun 5 15:26:51 UTC 2017 New revision: 442667 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/442667 Log: - Update to 1.30.4 PR: 219748 Submitted by: bsd@abinet.ru (maintainer) Changes: head/multimedia/zoneminder/Makefile head/multimedia/zoneminder/distinfo head/multimedia/zoneminder/pkg-plist > QA attached. For the future: should I always attach poudriere logs or QA passed statement should be enough?
QA passed statement is quite enough.
|
Created attachment 183171 [details] patch This is minor bug-fix release.